案例指导制度的效力定位

The Research of the Validity of Chinese Case-Guiding System

已初步构建的案例指导制度,旨在将指导司法实践的案例上升为制度的方式,发挥指导性案例对统一法律适用的作用。此项举措是我国司法审判机关的一项制度性创新,而指导性案例的效力依据及其定位问题无以回避,成为该项制度能否得以有力推动和有效发挥实际作用的关键。本文从中西方法律统一适用的历史发展背景中还原"判例"在不同法系、典型国家和传统文化差异下的效力性及其状态,在遵从司法规律的前提下,讨论在既有制度框架和现行司法体制的基础上合理确定指导性案例的法律效力。

The preliminarily constructed case guidance system, which aims at fully displaying the role of the guiding cases to unify the standards of legal application and follow the natural rule of judicial by turning the cases which are having a real effect on judicial practice into a kind of distinctive system. Cases which just binded individual paties in the past will eventu- ally develope into directing judicial future in a broader sense and therefore have multiple research values. Because the reform is a institutional innovation led by juridical authorities, the validity of Guiding cases has become an unavoidable foundation of solving all theoretical problems and the key of effectively working of the reform in judicial practice. To answer this question, ＂case＂ should be returned to the original state from the history background of western legal unified application in different legal systems, countries and traditional cultures, so we can reach an agreement of system construction by backing the universally judicial disciplines on the basis of existing constitutional government framework and legal system in our judicial body.