期刊文献+

三种配准方式下腹部肿瘤IGRT摆位误差的比较 被引量:13

Comparative Study on Set-up Errors with Different Image Alignment for Abdominal Tumor Underwent Image Guided Radiation Therapy
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨腹部肿瘤图像引导放射治疗(IGRT)治疗中不同图像配准方法对摆位误差的影响。方法医科达Synergy IGRT直线加速器分别治疗腹部肿瘤患者20例,每次治疗前均行锥形束CT(CBCT)扫描,重建获得的CBCT图像与原计划CT图像进行配准,分析X、Y、Z轴方向的平移误差及旋转误差,比较骨性配准、灰度值配准及手动配准间的差异。结果 20例腹部肿瘤患者治疗前共行282次CBCT扫描,手动配准、骨性配准、灰度值配准在X轴的平移误差分别为(-0.02±0.27)cm、(-0.04±0.28)cm、(-0.03±0.27)cm,在Y轴的平移误差分别为(0.08±0.46)cm、(0.11±0.48)cm、(0.09±0.48)cm,在Z轴的平移误差分别为(-0.01±0.28)cm、(-0.02±0.28)cm、(-0.02±0.28)cm;X轴的旋转误差分别为(0.57±1.78)°、(0.73±2.17)°、(0.67±1.98)°,在Y轴的旋转误差分别为(0.15±1.24)°、(0.12±1.51)°、(0.23±1.47)°,在Z轴的旋转误差分别为(0.05±0.92)°、(0.02±1.02)°、(0.18±1.04)°,其中骨性配准与灰度值配准结果差异无统计学意义,两者与手动配准的摆位误差结果差异有统计学意义。结论腹部肿瘤患者行IGRT时,需要根据病变具体部位选择配准方式,建议骨性配准后必要时结合手动微调,直到配准结果符合要求。 Objective To investigate the optimal alignment methods for the treatment of abdominal tumor in IGRT.Methods 20 abdominal tumor patients were treated with the Elekta Synergy IGRT system.KV-CBCT images received before every treatment fraction.The difference in bone alignment,grey value alignment and manual alignment was compared.Results Total of 282 sets of CBCT images were analyzed for 20 abdominal tumor.The mean±standard deviation in the X,Y and Z axis directions were(-0.02±0.27)cm,(-0.04±0.28)cm,(-0.03±0.27)cm;(0.08±0.46)cm,(0.11±0.48)cm,(0.09±0.48)cm;(-0.01±0.28)cm,(-0.02±0.28)cm,(-0.02±0.28)cm,respectively,in abdominal tumor with bone alignment,grey value alignment and manual alignment.The mean±standard deviation in the X,Y and Z rotation directions were(0.57±1.78)°,(0.73±2.17)°,(0.67±1.98)°;(0.15±1.24)°,(0.12±1.51)°,(0.23±1.47)°;(0.05±0.92)°,(0.02±1.02)° and(0.18±1.04)°,respectively,in abdominal tumor with bone alignment,grey value alignment and manual alignment.There was no significant difference between bone alignment and grey value alignment,but manual alignment was different from them.Conclusion There exists some extent of setup error in 3DCRT or IMRT of abdominal tumor patients.Which alignment can be chose based on the diseased region.It is suggested that manual adjustment after bone alignment is necessary.
出处 《肿瘤防治研究》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2011年第12期1434-1437,共4页 Cancer Research on Prevention and Treatment
基金 2010年广西研究生教育创新计划资助项目(2010105981002D30)
关键词 锥形束CT 配准方式 腹部肿瘤 CBCT Alignment Abdominal tumor
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

  • 1ICRU Report62.prescribing,recording,and reporting photon beam therapy(Supplement to ICRU Report 50)[R].1999.
  • 2ICRU Report50.prescribing,recording,and reporting photon beam therapy[R].1993.
  • 3戴建荣,胡逸民.图像引导放疗的实现方式[J].中华放射肿瘤学杂志,2006,15(2):132-135. 被引量:184
  • 4KuPelian PA,Willoughby T,Mahadevan A,et al.Multi-institutional clinical experience with the Calypso System in localization and continuous,real-time monitoring of the prostate gland during external radiotherapy[J].Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys,2007,67(4):1088-1098.
  • 5吴君心,谢志原,蒋思思,等.肝内病灶IGRT锥形束CT配准方法探讨[C]//中华医学会放射肿瘤治疗学分会六届二次暨中国抗癌协会肿瘤放疗专业委员会二届二次学术会议论文集.山东济南,中华医学会,中国抗癌协会肿瘤 放射治疗专业委员会,2009:449-451.

二级参考文献18

  • 1.调强适形放射治疗[A].胡逸民.肿瘤放射物理学[C].北京:原子能出版社,1999.538-612.
  • 2Hanley J,Debois MM,Mah D,et al.Deep inspiration breath-hold technique for lung tumors:the potential value of target immobilization and reduced lung density in dose escalation.Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys,1999,45:603-611.
  • 3Ramsey CR,Scaperoth D,Arwcod D,et al.Clinical efficacy of respiratory gated conformal radiation therapy.Med Dosim,1999,24:115-119.
  • 4Shirato H,Shimizu S,Kitamura K,et al.Four-dimensional treatment planning and fluoroscopic real-time tumor tracking radiotherapy for moving tumor.Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys,2000,48:435-442.
  • 5Keall PJ,Chen GTY,Joshi S,et al.Time-the fourth dimension in radiotherapy (ASTRO panel discussion).Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys,2003,57:S8-S9.
  • 6Yu CX,Jaffray DA,Wong JW.The effects of intra-fraction organ motion on the delivery of dynamic intensity modulation.Phys Med Biol,1998,43:91-104.
  • 7de Neve W,Heuvel F,De Beukeleer M,et al.Routine clinical on-line portal imaging followed by immediate field adjustment using a tele-controlled patient couch.Radiother Oncol,1992,24:45-54.
  • 8Hu YM,DM JR,Hu B.The precision and accuracy analysis of target position in X-ray stereotactic radiotherapy for extracranial lesions.In:Internation symposium of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS/SRT).Taejon:Chungnam National University Hospital,1997.
  • 9Yan D,Vicini F,Wong J,et al.Adaptive radiation therapy.Phys Med Biol,1997,42:4123-4132.
  • 10Birkner M,Yan D,Alber M,et al.Adapting inverse planning to patient and organ geometrical variation algorithm and implementation.Med Phys,2003,30:2822-2831.

共引文献183

同被引文献116

  • 1于金明,李宝生.调强放射治疗的临床应用现状与存在的问题[J].中华肿瘤杂志,2005,27(3):188-190. 被引量:43
  • 2于金明,袁双虎.图像引导放射治疗研究及其发展[J].中华肿瘤杂志,2006,28(2):81-83. 被引量:99
  • 3戴建荣,胡逸民.图像引导放疗的实现方式[J].中华放射肿瘤学杂志,2006,15(2):132-135. 被引量:184
  • 4李雪南,王丹,李高峰,肖素华.CT模拟定位系统外激光中心准确性的质量保证[J].中华放射肿瘤学杂志,2006,15(6):481-483. 被引量:5
  • 5倪昕晔,孙苏平,杨建华.图像引导放射治疗的研究现状[J].南通大学学报(医学版),2007,27(1):69-71. 被引量:9
  • 6Yan D, Vicini F, Wong J, et al. Adaptive radiation therapy [J].Phys Med Biol,1997,42(1) :123-132.
  • 7Bijhold J, van Herk M, Vijlbrief R, et al. Fast evaluation ofpatient set-up during radiotherapy by aligning features in portal andsimulator images [ J]. Phys Med Biol, 1991,36(2) : 1665-1679.
  • 8Van HM. Errors and margins in radiotherapy [J]. Semin RadiatOncol,2004,14 (1): 52-64. DOI: 10. 1053/j. semradonc. 2003.10.003.
  • 9Borst GR, Sonke JJ, Betgen A, et al. Kilo-voltage cone-beamcomputed tomography setup measurements for lung cancer patients :first clinical results and comparison with electronic portal-imagingdevice [ J]. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys,2007,68(2) :555-561.DOI: 10.1016/j. ijrobp. 2007. 01. 014.
  • 10Hawkins MA, Aitken A, Hansen VN, et al. Set-up errors inradiotherapy for oesophageal cancers—is electronic portal imagingor conebeam more accurate. [ J]. Radiother Oncol,2011,98(2):249-254. DOI: 10.1016/j. radonc. 2010.11.002.

引证文献13

二级引证文献111

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部