期刊文献+

面向DLM模式的商品族架构和商品配置管理模型 被引量:1

Commodity Family Structure and Configuration Management for DLM Mode
下载PDF
导出
摘要 为解决制造商主导的在线大规模定制模式无法满足顾客在线比较不同品牌商品功能和结构各类属性等问题。提出了经销商主导的在线大规模定制模式,从探讨顾客表达需求的方式和习惯入手,引入了功能配置元和结构配置元的概念,搭建顾客需求与产品功能结构之间的信息依赖模型。基于经销商视角构建商品族架构模型和客户化商品配置管理模型,定义出经销商商品配置模型和在线配置过程之间的依赖关系,构建出在线配置过程模型。通过案例证明了模型的可行性和有效性。 Now days, often the customers want to compare the functions, structures, and other attributes of the goods of different brands online. However, the on-line mass customization with manufacturer-led mode cannot satisfy such a customer demand. With this in mind, mass customization with dealer-led mode (DLM) is put forward in this paper. In order to present the expression ways and habits of customer demand, the concept of function and structure configuration elements are introduced. In this way, information dependence relationship between customer demand and product function and structure is built. Then, a model is built to describe the commodity group structure and customization configuration management in the distributor's perspective. And the dependency between the configuration process and the distributor's commodity family model is defined. A case problem is used to show the feasibility and effectiveness of the proposed method.
作者 伊辉勇 刘伟
出处 《工业工程》 北大核心 2011年第6期16-21,26,共7页 Industrial Engineering Journal
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(71102144) 中国博士后科学基金资助项目(20100470820) 重庆市自然科学基金资助项目(2009BB3230)
关键词 在线大规模定制 DLM(dealer—led mode)模式 商品族 商品配置管理 on-line customization dealer-led mode ( DLM ) commodity family configuration management
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1Jiao J X, Tseng M M. Fundamentals of product families architecture [ J ]. Integrated Manufacturing Systems, 2000, 11 (7) :469-483.
  • 2Raviraj U N, Wei C,Timothy W S. A variation-based method for product family design [ J ]. Engineering Optimization, 2002,34( 1 ) :65-81.
  • 3Jiang Z H, Yan J Q. Research and development on constraint-based product family design and assembly simulation [ J ]. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 2003,139 ( 1 ) :257-262.
  • 4CHEN Chunbao WANG Liya.MODIFIED GENETIC ALGORITHM APPLIED TO SOLVE PRODUCT FAMILY OPTIMIZATION PROBLEM[J].Chinese Journal of Mechanical Engineering,2007,20(4):106-111. 被引量:8
  • 5Fabrice A, Steven B, Timothy W. Assessing and improving commonality and diversity within a product family [ J ]. Research in Engineering Design,2009,20(4) : 241-253.
  • 6Felfernig A, Gerhard F, Dietmar J. Conceptual modeling for configuration of mass-customizable products [ J ]. Artificial Intelligent in Engineering,2001,15 (2) : 165-176.
  • 7Tseng Hwai E, Chien C C, Shu H C. Applying case-based reasoning for product configuration in mass customization environments[ J]. Expert Systems with Applications,2005,29 (2) :913-925.
  • 8Helo P T. Product configuration analysis with design structure matrix[ J ]. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 2006, 106(7) :997-1011.
  • 9Zheng L Y, Dong H F, Vichare P. Systematic modeling and reusing of process knowledge for rapid process configuration [ J ]. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, 2008,26(6) :763-772.
  • 10Yang D, Miao R, Wu H W. Product configuration knowl edge modeling using ontology web language [ J ]. Expert Systems with Applications, 2009(36) :4399-4411.

二级参考文献16

  • 1SIMPSON T, SOUZA B. Assessing variable levels of platform commonality within a product family using a multiobjective genetic algorithm[C]// 9th AIAA/ISSMO Symposium on Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization, 2002, Atlanta, GA. AIAA, Paper No. AIAA5427.
  • 2KOTA S, SETHURAMAN K, MILLER R. A metric for evaluating design commonality in product families[J]. ASME Journal of Mechanical Design, 2000, 122(4): 403-410.
  • 3JIAO J, TSENG M M. Understanding product family for mass customization by developing commonality indices[J]. Journal of Engineering Design, 2000, 11 (3): 225-243.
  • 4SIMPSON T. Product platform design and optimization: status and promise[C]//ASME Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, 2003, Chicago, Illinois, ASME, Paper No. DETC2003/DAC-48717.
  • 5DE WECK O L, SUH E S, CHANG D. Product family and platform portfolio optimization[C]//Proceedings of ASME Design Engineering Technical Conferences. Chicago, IL. 2003, Paper No. DETC03/DAC- 48721.
  • 6DAI Z, SCOTT M, Product platform design through sensitivity analysis and cluster analysis[C]//Prececdings of the ASME Design Engineering Technical Conference, 2004, Salt Lake City, UT: ASME, 2004: 893-905.
  • 7MESSAC A, MARTINEZ M, SIMPSON T. A penalty function for product family design using physical programming[J]. ASME Journal of Mechanical Design, 2002a, 124(2): 164-172.
  • 8NAYAK R, CHEN W, SIMPSON T. A variation-based method tor product family design[J]. Engineering Optimization, 2002, 34(1): 65-81.
  • 9GONZALEZ-ZUGASTI J P, OTTO K N, BAKER J D. A method tor arehitecting product platforms[J]. Research in Engineering Design, 2000, 12(2): 61-72
  • 10SOUZA B, SIMPSON T. A genetic algorithm based method for product family design optimization[C]//ASME Design Engineering Technical Conferences - Design Automation Conference (Fadel, G., ed.), September 29 - October 2, 2003, Montreal, Quebec, ASME,1-18.

共引文献9

同被引文献23

引证文献1

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部