摘要
物权法车位归属条款在立法方法上偏离了立法目的,规范其语言缺陷是车位归属条款司法解释出台的缘由。这一司法解释将判定车位空间归属依据回归了区分所有权的基本法理,但使物权法车位归属条款的功能有所弱化,需要协调两者之间的关系。车位归属司法解释本身也存在一些歧义,因而在适用中需要作出进一步解释。
The parking attributive provision (Article 74, paragraph 2) deviates from the legislative intent in legislative measures and exists some defects on the specification language, accounting for this judicial interpretation. The judicial interpretation will determine the attributive of parking spaces based on the basic legal principles of the distinction ownership. However, the judicial interpretation about parking space attributive, make the function of the property law' s parking attributive provision weakened, which requires coordination between the judicial interpretation of the relationship and property law provisions. Being some ambiguities in the terms of the judicial interpretation, this judicial interpretation itself also requires further applying explanation.
出处
《河南科技大学学报(社会科学版)》
2011年第6期86-90,共5页
Journal of Henan University of Science & Technology(Social science)
关键词
物权法
车位归属
司法解释
Property Law
parking attributive
judicial interpretation