期刊文献+

变应性鼻炎屋尘螨变应原集群免疫治疗与常规免疫治疗的对照研究 被引量:29

Comparative study on cluster and conventional immunotherapy with Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus in patients with allergic rhinitis
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的 对比变应性鼻炎患者接受集群免疫治疗和常规免疫治疗的疗效及安全性.方法 对80例屋尘螨过敏变应性鼻炎患者随机分组,一组接受集群免疫治疗,每周就诊1次,每次就诊注射2~3次,6周后达到维持剂量.另一组接受常规免疫治疗,每周就诊1次,每次就诊注射1次,14周后达到维持剂量.达维持剂量后两组病例继续以维持剂量治疗1年,治疗期间通过症状评分、药物评分,血清屋尘螨特异性IgG4和不良反应发生情况评价免疫治疗的疗效和安全性.结果 接受集群免疫治疗的患者更早出现症状评分的改善和对症药物使用的减少(第6周),更早出现血清屋尘螨特异性IgG4的升高(第6周).在剂量递增阶段,集群免疫治疗组进行534次注射,有3例出现6次全身不良反应,全身不良反应发生率为1.12%(6/534);常规免疫治疗组591次注射,共3例出现5次全身反应,全身性不良反应的发生率为0.85%(5/591),两组不良反应发生率差异无统计学意义(x2=0.333,P>0.05).结论 对治疗变应性鼻炎而言,集群免疫治疗与常规免疫治疗相比,可以更早地实现症状的改善和药物使用的减少,且具有同样的安全性,是一种有效、安全的治疗方法. Objective To compare the efficacy and safety of a 6-week cluster schedule of specific immunotherapy with that of a 14-week conventional schedule for the treatment of subjects with persistent allergic rhinitis(AR).Methods The trial was a prospective and randomized study involving 80 patients with persistent AR,who were allergic to Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus.While 40 patients were randomly assigned to the cluster schedule reaching the maintenance dose within 6 weeks,the other 40 patients were randomly assigned to the conventional schedule reaching the maintenance dose within 14 weeks.Symptom scores and medication scores were used to evaluate the clinical efficacy.Serum specific IgG4 level was examined to mark immunologic change,adverse reactions were recorded during the treatment.Results Cluster group achieved clinical efficacy(reducing symptom scores and medication score)and increasing serum specific IgG4 sooner(after 6 weeks treatment).During the incremental dose phase,there were 6 systemic adverse reactions(1.12% of all injection)in 3 patients in cluster group and there were 5 systemic adverse reactions(0.85% of all injection)in 3 patients in conventional group.No severe systemic reactions occurred in both group.There was no difference between the 2 groups in frequency or type of systemic reaction(x2 =0.333,P 〉 0.05).Conclusion The cluster schedule is a safe alternative to the conventional schedule with the advantage of achieving clinical effecacy sooner.
出处 《中华耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2011年第12期981-985,共5页 Chinese Journal of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery
基金 国家杰出青年科学基金(81025007) 国家自然科学基金(30872846) 国家自然科学青年基金(81000405) 北京市教委科技计划重点项目(KZ200910025008、KZ201110025027) 北京市科技新星计划(20078035)
关键词 鼻炎 变应性 常年性 免疫治疗 抗原 尘螨属 治疗结果 Rhinitis, allergic, perennial Immunotherapy Antigens, dermatophagoides Treatment outcome
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

  • 1Cox L,Nelson H,Lockey R,et al.Allergen immunotherapy:a practice parameter third update.J Allergy Clin Immunol,2011,127(1 Suppl):S1-55.
  • 2王成硕,张罗,韩德民,王向东,赵岩,周兵,刘健慧.标准化尘螨变应原疫苗治疗变应性鼻炎一年的疗效和安全性研[J].中国耳鼻咽喉头颈外科,2007,14(1):3-6. 被引量:61
  • 3王红玉,林小平,郝创利,张纯青,孙宝清,郑劲平,陈萍,盛锦云,邬扬源,钟南山.标准化屋尘螨疫苗免疫治疗对变应性支气管哮喘的疗效[J].中华结核和呼吸杂志,2006,29(10):679-687. 被引量:48
  • 4陈建军,项济生,孔维佳,舒宏,施秋梅,檀慧芳.阿罗格脱敏治疗变应性鼻炎的安全性研究[J].临床耳鼻咽喉科杂志,2006,20(5):208-209. 被引量:8
  • 5张罗,王成硕,王向东,赵岩,刘健慧,张伟,周兵,韩德民.变应性鼻炎集群免疫治疗的疗效和安全性临床分析[J].中华耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志,2008,43(3):187-191. 被引量:40
  • 6中华耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志编委会鼻科组 中华医学会耳鼻咽喉头颈外科学分会鼻科学组.变应性鼻炎诊断和治疗指南(2009年武夷山)[J].中华耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志,2009,44:977-978.
  • 7Alvarez-Cuesta E,Bousquet J,Canonica GW,et al.Standards for practical allergen-specific immunotherapy.Allergy,2006,61Suppl 82:1-20.
  • 8Bousquet J,Lockey R,Malling HJ.Allergen immunotherapy:therapeutic vaccines for allergic diseases.A WHO position paper.J Allergy Clin Immunol,1998,102:558-562.
  • 9Pierson-Mullany LK,Jackola D,Blumenthal M,et al.Altered allergen binding capacities of Amb a 1-specific IgE and IgG4 from ragwesd-sensitive patients receiving immunotherapy.Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol,2000,84:241-243.
  • 10Nouri-Aria KT,Wachholz PA,Francis JN,et al.Grass pollen immunotherapy induces mucosal and peripheral IL-10 responses and blocking IgG activity.J Immunol,2004,172:3252-3259.

二级参考文献44

共引文献222

同被引文献429

引证文献29

二级引证文献1847

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部