期刊文献+

Seismic design factors for RC special moment resisting frames in Dubai,UAE

Seismic design factors for RC special moment resisting frames in Dubai,UAE
下载PDF
导出
摘要 This study investigates the seismic design factors for three reinforced concrete (RC) framed buildings with 4, 16 and 32-stories in Dubai, UAE utilizing nonlinear analysis. The buildings are designed according to the response spectrum procedure defined in the 2009 International Building Code (IBC'09). Two ensembles of ground motion records with 10% and 2% probability of exceedance in 50 years (10/50 and 2/50, respectively) are used. The nonlinear dynamic resPonses to the earthquake records are computed using IDARC-2D. Key seismic design parameters are evaluated; namely, response modification factor (R), deflection amplification factor (Cd), system overstrength factor (Ωo), and response modification factor for ductility (Rd) in addition to inelastic interstory drift. The evaluated seismic design factors are found to significantly depend on the considered ground motion (10/50 versus 2/50). Consequently, resolution to the controversy of Dubai seismicity is urged. The seismic design factors for the 2/50 records show an increase over their counterparts for the 10/50 records in the range of 200%-400%, except for the D~ factor, which shows a mere 30% increase. Based on the observed trends, perioddependent R and Cd factors are recommended if consistent collapse probability (or collapse prevention performance) in moment frames with varying heights is to be expected. This study investigates the seismic design factors for three reinforced concrete (RC) framed buildings with 4, 16 and 32-stories in Dubai, UAE utilizing nonlinear analysis. The buildings are designed according to the response spectrum procedure defined in the 2009 International Building Code (IBC'09). Two ensembles of ground motion records with 10% and 2% probability of exceedance in 50 years (10/50 and 2/50, respectively) are used. The nonlinear dynamic resPonses to the earthquake records are computed using IDARC-2D. Key seismic design parameters are evaluated; namely, response modification factor (R), deflection amplification factor (Cd), system overstrength factor (Ωo), and response modification factor for ductility (Rd) in addition to inelastic interstory drift. The evaluated seismic design factors are found to significantly depend on the considered ground motion (10/50 versus 2/50). Consequently, resolution to the controversy of Dubai seismicity is urged. The seismic design factors for the 2/50 records show an increase over their counterparts for the 10/50 records in the range of 200%-400%, except for the D~ factor, which shows a mere 30% increase. Based on the observed trends, perioddependent R and Cd factors are recommended if consistent collapse probability (or collapse prevention performance) in moment frames with varying heights is to be expected.
出处 《Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration》 SCIE EI CSCD 2011年第4期495-506,共12页 地震工程与工程振动(英文刊)
关键词 Seismic design factors reinforced concrete special moment resisting frame DUBAI UAE Seismic design factors reinforced concrete special moment resisting frame Dubai UAE
  • 相关文献

参考文献38

  • 1Aldama-Bustos G, Bommer J, Fenton C and Stafford P (2009), "Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Analysis for Rock Sites in the Cities ofAbu Dhabi, Dubai and Ra's Al Khaymah, United Arab Emirates," Georisk, 3(1): 1-29.
  • 2American Society of Civil Engineers/Structural Engineering Institute (2005), Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and Other Structures, ASCE/SEI, Reston, Virginia.
  • 3Applied Technology Council (1978), Tentative Provisions for the Development of Seismic Regulations for Buildings, ATC Publication ATC 3-06, NBS Special Publication 510, NSF Publication 78-8, U. S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.
  • 4Barakat S, Shanableh A and Malkawi A (2008), "A Comparative Earthquakes Risk Assessment Approach Applied to the United Arab Emirates," Jordan Journal of Civil Engineering, 2(2): 139-151.
  • 5Comeau G, Rogers CA and Velchev K (2010), "Development of Seismic Force Modification Factors for Cold-formed Steel Strap Braced Walls," Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, 37(2): 236.
  • 6Commission of the European Communities (1994), ENV 1989, Eurocode 8, Structures in Seismic Regions.
  • 7Computers & Structures Inc. (2010), ETABS, Integrated Finite Element Analysis and Design of Structures, User's Manual, CSI, Berkeley, Califomia.
  • 8Elnashai AS and Broderick BM (1996), "Seismic Response of Composite Frames - II. Calculation of behaviour Factors," Engineering Structures, 18(9): 707-723.
  • 9FEMA (2009), Quantification of Building Seismic Performance Factors, FEMA P695, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, D.C.
  • 10Foutch D and Wilcoski J (2005), "A Rational Approach for Determining Response Modification Factors for Seismic Design of Buildings Using Current Code Provisions," Earthquake Spectra, 21(2): 339-352.

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部