期刊文献+

胸腔积液CYFRA21-1、NSE和CEA联合检测在肺癌分型及临床分期中的临床意义 被引量:3

Clinical Significance of Combined Detection of CYFRA21-1,NSE and CEA in Classification and Staging of Patients with Lung Cancer
下载PDF
导出
摘要 探讨胸腔积液中CYFRA21-1(细胞角蛋白19片段)、NSE和CEA的检测在肺癌分型及临床分期中的意义。采用电化学发光法检测330例肺癌患者胸腔积液和43例良性胸积液中的CYFRA21-1、NSE和CEA水平。结果显示,肺癌组胸腔积液的CYFRA21-1、NSE和CEA水平明显高于良性胸积液组(P<0.01)。不同病理类型肺癌的标志物阳性率各不相同,鳞癌组CYFRA21-1阳性率最高,为65.5%;腺癌组CEA阳性率最高,为65.0%;小细胞未分化癌组NSE阳性率最高,为79.5%,三项联合检测阳性率高于单项检测;标志物水平与临床分期呈正相关,临床分期越晚,标志物水平越高,Ⅲ~Ⅳ期明显高于Ⅰ~Ⅱ期(P<0.05)。结论:CYFRA21-1、NSE和CEA联合检测能提高肺癌检测阳性率,并对肺癌的分型及临床分期有临床意义。 To explore clinical value of combined detection of CYFRA21-1,NSE and CEA in classification and staging of patients with lung cancer,the CYFRA21-1,NSE and CEA levels in pleural effusion in 330 patients with lung cancer and in 43 patients with benign were detected by the electrochemiluminescence.The results showed that CYFRA21-1,NSE and CEA levels in pleural effusion in patients with lung cancer group were significantly higher than that of in benign group(P〈0.01).The positive rate of tumor markers in different pathological type lung cancer were different,which CYFRA21-1 positive rate in squamous cell cancer group was highest with 65.5%;CEA positive rate in glands cancer group was supreme with 65.0%;the NSE positive rate in differentiation cancer group was highest with 79.5%.The positive rate in three markers combined detection was higher than that in one item detection.The tumor marker levels in lung cancer were positively related with clinical staging.The higher of tumor marker levels and the more late of clinical staging,and the clinical Ⅲ-Ⅳ period was obviously higher than thatⅠ-Ⅱ period(P〈0.05).The combined detection of CYFRA21-1,NSE and CEA may enhance the positive rate in lung cancer detection,and may have significant clinical value in the classification and staging of patients with lung cancer.
出处 《标记免疫分析与临床》 CAS 2011年第6期359-362,共4页 Labeled Immunoassays and Clinical Medicine
关键词 胸腔积液 肺癌 细胞角蛋白19片段 神经元特异烯醇化酶 癌胚抗原 联合检测 Pleural effusion Lung cancer CYFRA21-1 NSE CEA Combined detection
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

二级参考文献24

  • 1王实,夏书月,黄玉华,杨春.支气管灌洗液中癌胚抗原和β_2微球蛋白测定的临床意义[J].中国实用内科杂志,1996,16(6):349-350. 被引量:2
  • 2胡华成.支气管肺泡灌洗术临床应用进展[J].实用肺科杂志,1995,1:43-43.
  • 3朱元珏.血清与支气管肺泡灌洗中癌胚抗原单克隆抗体测定对肺癌诊断作用[J].中华结核和呼吸杂志,1987,10:2-2.
  • 4李振华.支气管肺泡灌洗液中CEA、SIgA和B2-M测定对肺癌诊断意义[J].中华结核和呼吸杂志,1996,10:268-268.
  • 5蔡定明.支气管肺泡灌洗对周围型肺癌诊断价值[J].中华结核和呼吸杂志,1995,5:59-59.
  • 6赵凤瑞.支气管冲洗液中IgA免疫酶标测定法在肺癌诊断中的初步应用[J].中华结核和呼吸杂志,1983,6:202-202.
  • 7Teresa C P, Isabel T Z, Juan B L, et al. Tumour markers in lung cancer: does the method of obtaining the cut - off point and reference population influence diagnostic yield? [ J ]. Clinical Biochemistry, 1999, 32:467 - 472.
  • 8Ho Y J, Hsieh J F, Tasi S C, et al. Tissue polypeptide specific antigen and squamous cell carcinoma antigen for early prediction of recurrence in lung squamous cell carcinoma[J] .Lung, 2000, 178:75 - 80.
  • 9Bates J, Rutherford M, Divilly M, et al. Clinical value of CYFRA21- 1, carcinoembryonic antigen and tissue polypeptideantigen in the diagnosis of lung cancer[J ]. Eur Respir J, 1997,10:2535 - 3538.
  • 10Manual D, Antonio T, Marina P, et al. Prognostic significance of serum CA125 antigen assay in patients with non - small cell lung cancer[J ]. Cancer, 1994, 73:1368 - 1376.

共引文献83

同被引文献17

引证文献3

二级引证文献31

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部