期刊文献+

血清NSE和CA125作为小细胞肺癌疗效评价指标的临床价值 被引量:8

Clinical value of NSE and CA125 as an indicator of assessing therapeutic efficacy in small cell lung cancer
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的研究血清NSE和CA125作为小细胞肺癌(SCLC)疗效评价指标的价值。方法以NSE和(或)CA125升高的87例初治SCLC患者为研究对象,所有患者均采用化疗为主的治疗手段。按RECIST评价标准判断疗效,并分析治疗前后肿瘤标志物的变化与近期疗效的关系。结果部分缓解(PR)31例,稳定(SD)29例,进展(PD)27例。按肿瘤标志物的变化率分为下降组,升高组和稳定组,NSE下降组37例,升高组5例,稳定组31例;CA125下降组26例,升高组5例,稳定组14例。肿瘤标志物的变化率与影像学疗效评价显著相关。结论治疗前后NSE和CA125的变化可作为SCLC患者的影像学评价的预测指标。 Objective To investigate the value of NSE or CA125 as an indicator in assessing therapeutic efficacy in small cell lung cancer (SCLC) patients. Methods 87 cases of SCLC with chemotherapy were enrolled into this retrospective study. The serum NSE or CA125 levels of all patients were above the cut-off limit before treatment. The relationship between changes of tumor markers (TMs) and imaging therapeutic efficacy was analyzed. Result According to RECIST criteria, partial response (PR) occurred in 31 cases: stable disease (SD) in 29 and progressive disease (PD) in 27. The cut-off values of the changes of TMs between pre- and post-treatment were determined according to the above mentioned criteria. The NSE down, above, stable groups were 37, 5 and 31 cases, respectively. CA125 down, above, stable groups were 26 , 5 and 14 cases, respectively. Changes in serum tumor markers and imaging efficacy evaluation rate were significantly correlated ( rNSE = 0.52, PNSE = 0.00, rCA125 = 0. 44, PCA125 = 0. 00 ). Conclusion NSE and CA125 before and after treatment changes in SCLC patients can be as a predictor of imaging evaluation.
出处 《临床肺科杂志》 2012年第1期99-100,共2页 Journal of Clinical Pulmonary Medicine
关键词 神经特异性烯醇化酶(NSE) CA125 小细胞肺癌 NSE CA125 small cell lung cancer
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

二级参考文献31

  • 1余文聘,郑小河,吴洁文.胃泌素释放肽前体在小细胞肺癌诊断中的研究进展[J].汕头大学医学院学报,2004,17(2):127-128. 被引量:13
  • 2廖秋林,李莲花,陈铭声.肺癌患者血清sTNFR、CEA和NSE的检测及其临床意义[J].中国现代医学杂志,2006,16(11):1635-1638. 被引量:7
  • 3林沛茹,赵祝香,刘朝晖,赵子文.血清CEA联合CA125,CA199及CA153检测在肺癌诊断中的价值[J].广东医学,2006,27(11):1694-1695. 被引量:15
  • 4Muley T, Fetz TH, Dienemann H, et al. Tumor volume and tumor marker index based on CYERA 21--1 and CEA are strong prognostic factors in operated early stage NSCLC[J]. Lung Cancer, 2008, 60(3): 408---415.
  • 5Shimanuki Y, Takahashi K, Cui R, et al. Role of serum vascular endothelial growth factor in the prediction of angiogenesis and prognosis for non-small cell lung cancer[J]. Lung, 2005, 183(1): 29--42.
  • 6Jiang X, ZhouJH, Deng ZH, et al. Expression and significance of Notchl,Jaggedl and VEGF in human non--small cell lung cancer[J]. Zhong Nan Da Xue Xue Ban Yi Xue Ban[J]. 2007, 32(6): 1031-1036.
  • 7Tas F, Duranyildiz D, Oguz H, et al. Serum vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and bcl-2 levels in advanced stage non--small cell lung cancer[J]. Cancer Invest, 2006, 24(6): 576---580.
  • 8Kim HS, Park NH, Chung HH, et al. Serum CA-125 level after 6 cycles of primary adjuvant chemotherapy is a useful prognostic factor for complete responders' survival in patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer[J]. Onkologie, 2008, 31 (6) : 315-320.
  • 9Chiu CH, Shih YN, Tsai CM, et al. Serum tumor markers as predictors for survival in advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients treated with gefifinib[J]. Lung Cancer, 2007, 57(2): 213-221.
  • 10KulpaJ, Wojcik E, Reinfuss M, et al. Carcinoembryonic antigen, squamous cell carcinoma antigen, CYFRA 21-1, and neuron-specific enolase in squamous cell lung cancer pafients[J]. Clin Chem, 2002, 48(11): 1931-1937.

共引文献72

同被引文献87

引证文献8

二级引证文献47

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部