期刊文献+

预测淋巴结阳性阴茎癌手术后无病生存率列线图的建立 被引量:5

Construction of a nomogram to predict disease free survival in node-positive penile cancer treated with surgery
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的建立预测淋巴结阳性阴茎癌患者手术后无病生存率的列线图。方法回顾性分析32例淋巴结阳性阴茎鳞状细胞癌患者的临床病理资料。患者均接受了阴茎肿瘤切除和区域淋巴结清扫术。N1期10例,N2期13例,N3期9例。术前鳞状细胞癌抗原(SCCAg)水平0—19.8μg/L,中位值为0.9μg/L。随访3—31个月,中位时间16.5个月。患者出现疾病复发13例。预后指标包括分期、分级和术前SCCAg水平。采用Cox回归模型建立列线图。结果血清SCCAg水平的风险比值为2.76(95%CI:1.40~5.44,P=0.0034),而N分期的风险比值为28.51(95%C1:2.55~319.11,P=0.0066)。列线图一致系数为0.862,经过自助法校正后为0.855;校正曲线显示模型的符合度良好。N分期和术前SCCAg水平是预测淋巴结阳性阴茎癌患者手术后无病生存率的独立预后因素。结论基于分期和术前SCCAg水平,构建预测淋巴结阳性阴茎癌手术后无病生存率的列线图,有助于个体化判断肿瘤复发的风险及与患者交流和综合治疗选择。 Objective To construct a nomogram for estimating disease free survival of node-positive penile cancer treated with surgery. Methods The clinieopathological data of 32 node-positive penile squamous cell carcinoma patients were retrospectively reviewed. All patients had undergone primary tumor excision and regional lymphadeneetomy. The pathological records showed that 10 were N1 , 13 were N2 and 9 were N3. Median level of preoperative squamous cell carcinoma antigen (SCCAg) was 0.9 μg/L. With a median follow-up of 16.5 months, 13 patients developed recurrence. Based on the stage, histological grade and preoperative serum squamous cell carcinoma antigen level, a nomogram was drawn on the basis of the Cox regression model. Results Stage and preoperative serum SCCAg levels were independent prognostic factors for disease free survival in node-positive penile cancer treated with surgery. The hazard ratio of SC- CAgleveland N stage was 2.76 (95% CI: 1.40 -5.44, P =0.0034) and 28.51 (95%C1:2.55 - 319.11, P=0. 0066). The nomogram demonstarted good discrimination and calibration with a concordance index of 0. 855. Conclusions Based on the N stage and preoperative serum SCCAg level, a nomogram to predict disease free survival in node-positive penile cancer treated with surgery was set up. The prediction model could be helpful in predicting the risk of recurrence.
出处 《中华泌尿外科杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2011年第12期807-810,共4页 Chinese Journal of Urology
关键词 阴茎肿瘤 预后 生存分析 列线图 Penile neoplasms Carcinoma Prognosis Survival analysis Nomogram
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

  • 1Pettaway CA, Lynch Jr DF, Davis JW. Tumors of the Penis// Wein AJ. Campbell-Walsh urology. 9th ed: Saunders elsevier, 2007 : 301-302.
  • 2Graafland NM, van Boven HH, van Werkhoven E, et al. Prognostic significance of extranodal extension in patients with pathological node positive penile carcinoma. J Urol, 2010, 184: 1347-1353.
  • 3Pagliaro LC, Williams DL, Daliani D, et al. Neoadjuvant paclitaxel, ifosfamide, and cisplatin chemotherapy for metastatic penile cancer: a phase Ⅱ study. J Clin Oncol, 2010, 28: 3851-3857.
  • 4Zhu Y, Li H, Yao XD, et al. Feasibility and activity of sorafenib and sunitinib in advanced penile cancer: a preliminary report. Urol Int, 2010, 85: 334-340.
  • 5Greene FL. AJCC cancer staging manual. 6th ed. New York: Springer, 2002: 35-36.
  • 6Brkovic D, Kalble T, Dorsam J, et al. Surgical treatment of invasive penile cancer--the Heidelberg experience from 1968 to 1994. Eur Urol, 1997, 31: 339-342.
  • 7Pandey D, Mahajan V, Kannan RR. Prognostic factors in nodepositive carcinoma of the penis. Surg Oncol, 2006, 93 : 133-138.
  • 8Novara G, Galfano A, De Marco V, et al. Prognostic factors in squamous cell carcinoma of the penis. Nat Clin Pract Urol,2007, 4 : 140-146.
  • 9Marconnet L, Rigaud J, Bouchot O. Long-term followup of penile carcinoma with high risk for lymph node invasion treated with inguinal lymphadenectomy. J Urol, 2010, 183: 2227-2232.
  • 10Zhu Y, Ye D W, Yao XD, et al. The value of squamous cell carcinoma antigen in the prognostic evaluation, treatment monitoring and followup of patients with penile cancer. J Urol, 2008, 180: 2019-2023.

二级参考文献9

  • 1Lynch DF, Pettaway CA. Tumors of the penis//Walsh PC, Retik AB, Stamey TA, et al. Campbell urology. 8th ed. Philadelphia: Saunders, 2002:2945 -2982.
  • 2Zhu Y, Zhou XY, Yao XD, et al. The prognostic significance of p53, Ki-67, epithelial eadherin and matrix metalloproteinase 9 in penile squamous cell carcinoma treated with surgery. BJU Int, 2007, 100:204-208.
  • 3Fraley EE, Zhang G, Manivel C, et al. The role of ilioinguinal lymphadenectomy and significance of histological differentia tion in treatment of carcinoma of the penis. J Urol, 1989, 142: 1478-1482.
  • 4Horenblas S, van Tinteren H. Squamous cell carcinoma of the penis. IV. Prognostic factors of survival: analysis of tumor, nodes and metastasis classification system. J Urol, 1994, 151: 1239-1243.
  • 5Ficarra V, Zattoni F, Cunico SC, et al. Lymphatic and vascular embolizations are independent predictive variables of ingui nal lymph node involvement in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the penis: Gruppo Uro-Oncologico del Nord Est (Northeast Uro-Oncological Group) Penile Cancer data base data. Cancer, 2005, 103:2507-2516.
  • 6Solsona E, Iborra I, Rubio J, et ai. Prospective validation of the association of local tumor stage and grade as a predictive factor for occult lymph node micrometastasis in patients with penile carcinoma and clinically negative inguinal lymph nodes. J Urol, 2001, 165: 1506-1509.
  • 7Solsona E, Algaba F, Horenblas S, et al. EAU Guidelines on Penile Cancer. Eur Urol, 2004, 46: 1-8.
  • 8Solsona E, forra I, Ricos JV, et al. Corpus cavernosum invasion and tumor grade in the prediction of lymph node condition in penile carcinoma. Eur Urol, 1992, 22: 115-118.
  • 9Shariat SF, Karakiewicz PI, Suardi N, et al. Comparison of nomograms with other methods for predicting outcomes in prostate cancer: a critical analysis of the literature. Clin Cancer Res, 2008, 14: 4400-4407.

共引文献2

同被引文献36

  • 1戴波,叶定伟,方银忠,刘守业,孔蕴毅.阴茎疣状癌的诊治[J].中华泌尿外科杂志,2005,26(6):425-427. 被引量:10
  • 2Graafland NM,van Boven HH,van Werkhoven E. Prognostic significance of extranodal extension in patients with pathological node positive penile carcinoma[J].{H}Journal Of Urology,2010,(4):1347-1353.
  • 3Sobin LH,Gospodariwics MK,Wittekind C. TNM Classification of Malignant Tumours (UICC International Union Against Cancer)[M].Willy-Blackwell,2009.239-242.
  • 4Pandey D,Mahajan V,Kannan RR. Prognostic factors in node-positive carcinoma of the penis[J].{H}Journal of Surgical Oncology,2006,(2):133-138.
  • 5Theunissen PH,Bollen EC,Koudstaal J. Intranodal and extranodal tumour growth in early metastasised non-small cell lung cancer:problems in histological diagnosis[J].{H}Journal of Clinical Pathology,1994,(10):920-923.
  • 6Curado MP,Edwards B,Shin HR. Cancer incidence in five continents[M].Lyon:IARC Scientific Publications,2007.212-216.
  • 7Waterhouse J,Muir CS,Shanmugaratnam K. Cancer incidence in five continents[M].Lyon:IARC Scientific Publications,1982.1-807.
  • 8Srinivas V,Morse MJ,Herr HW. Penile cancer:relation of extent of nodal metastasis to survival[J].{H}Journal Of Urology,1987,(5):880-882.
  • 9Ravi R. Correlation between the extent of nodal involvement and survival following groin dissection for carcinoma of the penis[J].{H}British Journal of Urology,1993,(5 Pt 2):817-819.
  • 10Lont AP,Kroon BK,Gallee MP. Pelvic lymph node dissection for penile carcinoma:extent of inguinal lymph node involvement as an indicator for pelvic lymph node involvement and survival[J].{H}Journal Of Urology,2007,(3):947-952.

引证文献5

二级引证文献22

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部