期刊文献+

噬菌体作指标病毒用于消毒效果评价的研究 被引量:3

The Evaluation of Bacteriophage as An Indicator Viruses for Disinfection
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨不同浓度三氯异氰尿酸消毒溶液及不同温度条件对噬菌体的灭活率影响。方法分别将浓度为150(A)、150(B)、200(C)、250(D)mg/L的三氯异氰尿酸溶液各4mL与置备好的噬菌体悬液1mL混合,A组中加入小牛上清液,分别观察各组灭活率;将B组剩余混合液分为三组进行10℃(E)、20℃(F)、30℃(G)的温度试验,分别观察灭活率。结果浓度为150(B3)、200(C3)、250mg/L(D3)的消毒液灭活率分别为99.895%、99.998%、100%,随着消毒液浓度的增加,灭活率增大,C3、D3分别与B3比较具有显著差异(χ2=5.96、7.28,P<0.05),C3、D3比较无显著差异(χ2=2.59,P>0.05);150mg/L消毒液加小牛上清液的灭活率为98.574%,明显低于B3,数据经统计学分析具有显著差异(χ2=7.39,P<0.05);10℃灭活率99.794%明显低于20℃灭活率99.995%(χ2=9.78,P<0.05),30℃灭活率99.665%明显低于20℃灭活率99.995%(χ2=8.56,P<0.05)。结论噬菌体是评价三氯异氰酸消毒效果的较好指示病毒,且消毒液浓度越高,其消毒效果越佳,但高温可能通过降低消毒液的浓度而影响消毒效果。 Objective To discuss the effects of phage inactivation rate due to different concentrations of trichloroisocyanuric acid (TCCA) and different temperatures. Methods To separately make 4ml different concentrations of TCCA into lml mixed phage suspension, and the group A was combined with mavericks supernatant. Then to make different temperature condition for the experiment. To observe the inactivation rate. Results The inactivation rate of 150, 200, 250mg/L TCCT were 99.895%, 99.998% and 100%, with the increasing concentration of disinfectant, inactivation rate increased. The inactivation rate of 150mg/L disinfectant combined with mavericks supernatant was 98.574%, which was significantly lower than B3 (P(0.05). The inactivation rate in 10℃(99.794%) was significantly lower than in 20℃(99.995%) (P〈Z0.05), and in 30℃(99.665%) was significantly higher than in 20℃ (P(0.05). Conclusion Phage was a better indication for TCCT disinfection. The higher disinfectant concentration, the better disinfection effects. But high temperature could affect the disinfectant by reducing the concentration of disinfectant.
出处 《中国医药指南》 2011年第35期278-279,共2页 Guide of China Medicine
关键词 噬菌体 指标病毒 消毒效果 Phage Indicator Virus Disinfection Evaluation
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献112

  • 1彭丽,罗永艾,王国治.噬菌体生物扩增法快速检测结核分枝杆菌标准化研究[J].中华结核和呼吸杂志,2004,27(12):806-810. 被引量:23
  • 2林健雄,黄国盛,赵立文,陈伟生.噬菌体裂解法与涂片法对肺结核的诊断价值比较[J].临床肺科杂志,2005,10(4):429-430. 被引量:4
  • 3Prescott LM,Harley JP,Klein DA.Microbiology.5th ed.Ohio:McGraw-Hill Companies,Inc.,2002.363-364,381-397.
  • 4Russell AD,Hugo WB,Ayliffe GA.Principles and practice of disinfection,preservation and sterilization.3rd ed.Oxford:Blackwell Science Ltd,1999.46-49,101-102.
  • 5Block SS.Disinfection,Sterilization,and preservation.5th ed.Philadelphia:Lippincott Williams & Wilkins,2001.149-150,65-78.
  • 6刘育京.消毒动力学与杀菌作用指标[J].消毒与灭菌,1984,1:101-106.
  • 7Aziz R K,Kotb M.Rise and persistence of global M1T1 clone of Streptococcus pyogenes[J].Emerg Infect Dis,2008,14(10):1511-1517.
  • 8Facklam RF,Martin DR,Lovgren M,et al.Extension of the Lancefield classification for group A streptococci[J].Clin Infect Dis,2002,34:28-38.
  • 9Davies HD,McGeer A,Schwartz B,et al.Invasive group A streptococcal infections in Ontario Canada[J].N Engl J Med,1996,335:547-554.
  • 10Bisno AL,GerberMA,Gwaitney JM,et al.Practice guidelines for the diagnosis and management of group A streptococcal pharyngitis[J].Clin Infect Dis,2002,35:113-125.

共引文献24

同被引文献38

引证文献3

二级引证文献10

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部