期刊文献+

M&S可信度的形式化评估

Formulated Evaluation of M&S Credibility
下载PDF
导出
摘要 针对仿真可信度评估是VV&A的核心内容,为了有效的利用VV&A活动的有关信息,提高可信度的准确性和可操作性,提出根据形式化评估来提高可信度的准确性和可操作性。首先对仿真可信度的概念进行了描述,然后从主观概率的观点出发,指出了M&S可信度的形式化的概念———概率概念的某种推广、具有条件独立性、层次性以及与相似性原理的一致性。最后结合模型层次性结构和M&S开发生命周期,论证了可信度形式化概念的具体应用。通过分析和论证,表明了M&S可信度形式化评估的可操作性和准确性。和传统的方法相比,新提出的评估方法考虑了M&S全生命周期的评估,为仿真模型可信度评估提供了正确方法。 Credibility evaluation of modeling & simulation is the key of VV&A, and it is crucial to using information efficiently provided by VV&A activities for promoting the accuracy of simulation credibility. In this paper, the accuracy of simulation credibility was studied from formulated evaluation. Firstly, the paper described the definition of simulation credibility. Secondly, from subject probability opinion, the formulated definition of credibility of M&S was formulated from the followings: generalization of the probability concept, conditional independence, hierarchy and consistency with the similarity law. Finally, based on the hierarchy structure of models and M&S lifecycle, the paper discussed the applications of formulated evaluation of simulation credibility. Through discussion and analyses, it shows that the formulated evaluation definition of simulation credibility is operable and correct. The method pro- posed by this paper considers M&S lifecycle evaluation compared with traditional evaluation methods.
出处 《计算机仿真》 CSCD 北大核心 2011年第12期77-79,129,共4页 Computer Simulation
关键词 建模与仿真 可信度 条件独立性 层次性 Modeling & simulation Credibility Conditional independence Hierarchy
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

二级参考文献32

  • 1洪晔,边信黔,王宏健.AUV半实物仿真系统的可信度研究[J].微计算机信息,2004,20(12):136-137. 被引量:4
  • 2周源泉 翁朝曦.可靠性评定[M].北京:科学出版社,1991..
  • 3Dale K.Issues related to quantifying simulation validation[C]//Proceedings of 2001 Fall Simulation Interoperability Workshop.Orlando,FL:SISO,2001.
  • 4Arthur J D,Sargent R G,Dbney J B,et al.Verification and validation:what impact should project size and complexity have on attendant V&V activities and supporting infrastructure[C]//Proceedings of the 1999 Winter Simulation Conference.Phoenix,AZ:IEEE,1999:148-155.
  • 5GB/T16260-1996.信息技术软件产品评价质量特性及其使用指南[S].1996.
  • 6Osman B,William F.Planning for verification,validation,and accreditation of modeling and simulation applications[C]//Proceedings of the 2000 Winter Simulation Conference.Orlando,FL:IEEE,2000:829-839.
  • 7Robert J,Michael L.Requirements-the first essential ingredient in a VV&A process[C]//Proceedings of 2001 European Simulation Interoperability Workshop.Orlando,FL:SISO,2001.
  • 8Dale K.The roles of metrics in simulation verification and validation[C]//Proceedings of 2003 Spring Simulation Interoperability Workshop.Orlando,FL:SISO,2003.
  • 9Yang Jianbo,Sen P.Multiple attribute design evaluation of complex engineering products using the evidential reasoning approach[J].Journal of Engineering Design,1997,8(3):211 -230.
  • 10扎得L A.模糊集合,语言变量及模糊逻辑[M].北京:科学出版社,1982:65-66.

共引文献70

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部