期刊文献+

替代话语的析解——“外延内涵传承说”认知—心智再阐释 被引量:25

A Cognitive-Pragmatic Explanation of Substitution in Metaphorical Expression
原文传递
导出
摘要 隐喻性话语除隐喻以外,还有一些技巧语言的说法,都是以替代为特征的,如夸张、委婉语、隐语、歇后语等。这些表达的生成机制,基本上是替代和被替代成分之间的外延内涵的传承。我们尝试从概念外延内涵的传承,对这些以替代为核心手段的隐喻性表达的成因做了统一的认知—心智的解释。由于它涉及多种的修辞表达现象,"外延内涵传承说"可望有比较好的应用前景;还由于它涉及人们认识事物的类层级结构,因而也会有值得注意的理论价值。 There are quite a few skillful metaphorical expressions in Chinese with substitution as its main characteristic in the form of benti(本体) is yuti(喻体), such as metaphor, metonymy, hyperbole, euphemism, argot; xiehouyu and so on. The chief generation mechanism of such expressions is basically the inheritance of its denotation-connotation, which constitutes the basis of the explanation of the forming of such rhetorical expressions. Due to its wide application to a lot of linguistic phenome- na, this theoretical framework is of quite happy perspective in the future use ; and due to the fact that the framework has much to do with the conceptual network of type hierarchy structure, it is also of theoretical value which merits attention.
作者 徐盛桓
出处 《外语教学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2012年第1期1-7,共7页 Foreign Language Education
关键词 外延内涵传承 隐喻性表达 替代 inheritance of denotation-connotation metaphorical expression substitution
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

  • 1Croft, W. and A. D. Cruse. Cognitive Linguistics [ M ]. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press,2004.
  • 2Evans, V. A Glossary of Cognitive Linguistics [ M ]. Salt Lake City : The University of Utah Press, 2007.
  • 3Lakoffl G. The Invariance hypothesis : Is abstract reason based on image-schema? [J]. Cognitive Linguistics, 1999(1 ) :39-74.
  • 4Lakoff, G. The contemporary theory of metaphor[A]. In Andrew Ortony(ed. ). Metaphor and Thought[C]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993 : 202-251.
  • 5Lakoff, G. & M. Johnson. Philosophy in the Flash; The Embodied Mind and Its Challenge to Western Thought [ M ]. New York : Basic Books, 1999.
  • 6徐盛桓.外延内涵传承说——转喻机理新论[J].外国语,2009,32(3):2-9. 被引量:82
  • 7徐盛桓.“A是B”的启示——再谈外延内涵传承说[J].中国外语,2010,7(5):22-29. 被引量:29

二级参考文献32

  • 1周北海.概称句本质与概念[J].北京大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2004,41(4):20-29. 被引量:45
  • 2汪堂家.隐喻诠释学:修辞学与哲学的联姻——从利科的隐喻理论谈起[J].哲学研究,2004(9):71-77. 被引量:37
  • 3Ahrens, K. When love is not digested: Underlying reasons for source to target domain pairing in the contemporary theory of metaphor [ OL ]. At homepage, ntu. edu. tw - ahrens/pdf/when % 201ove% 20is% 20not% 20 digested, pdf. accessed 2008/10/19.
  • 4Barcelona, A. On plausibility of claiming a metonymic motivation for conceptual metaphor [ A ]. Barcelona, A. Metaphor and Metonymy at the Crossroads [ C ]. Berlin, New York : Mouton de Gruyter, 2000.
  • 5Croft, W. & D. A, Cruce, Cognitive Linguistics [ M ]. Cambridge : Cambridge Press, 2004.
  • 6Evans, V. A Grossary of Cognitive Linguistics [ M ]. Salt lake City: The university of Utah Press, 2007.
  • 7Falkenhainer, B., K. D. Forbur & D. Genrner. The structure mapping engine: Algorithm and examples [ J ]. Artificial Intelligences, 1989,41 : 1 - 63.
  • 8Fauconnier, G. and M. Turner. Conceptual integration networks [ J ]. Cognitive Science, 1998, (22)2:133 - 187.
  • 9Fauconnier, G. and M. Turner. Principles of Conceptual Integration [ A ]. J.-P. Koenig. Discourse and Cognition [ C ]. Stanford : CSLI Publications, 1998.
  • 10Gentner, D. Structure-mapping: A theoretical framework for analogy [ J ]. Cognitive Science, 1983,7 : 155 - 170.

共引文献91

同被引文献343

引证文献25

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部