期刊文献+

美国公立高校绩效评价体系内容与特点分析——以田纳西州为例 被引量:13

Analysis on the Content and Characteristics of the Public Higher Education Institution Performance Evaluation System in the United States——Taking Tennessee State as An Example
原文传递
导出
摘要 美国公立高校绩效评价是美国州高等教育绩效问责制度中的重要环节。本文对田纳西州2010年~2015年绩效资助政策中的绩效评价体系进行分析,认为其具有以下特点:是一种自我评价基础之上的第三方评价;强调计划性和周期性,目标明确,重点突出;聚焦于教育质量保障,尤其关注本科生的学习成效、学科专业项目的质量和学生的满意度;利用美国国内现有的、影响较大的各类测评机构的测试结果或调查结果作为评价依据;注重对绩效评价本身的质量保障。 Performance evaluation of the public higher education institutions is a key element in the state accountability system in the U.S. Based on the 2010~2015 Performance Funding policy of Tennessee, this paper analyzes the contents of the performance evaluation system which is a core of the Performance Funding policy. The characteristics of this performance evaluation system are as follow: it is periodic ,with good planning and obvious emphasis. It focuses on education quality guarantee, and particularly on the concerns of undergraduates learning outcomes, the quality of academic program and students' satisfaction. It makes use of the current and influential assessment agency's investigation outcomes or test outcomes as evaluation evidence. It emphasizes the quality of the evaluation itself. However, this kind of performance evaluation also has its own shortcomings.
出处 《比较教育研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2012年第1期23-27,共5页 International and Comparative Education
基金 国家社会科学基金教育学重点课题"高校绩效评价研究"(课题编号:AIA090007)的研究成果之一
关键词 美国 田纳西州 问责制 公立高校 绩效评价 accountability public higher education institutions performance evaluations
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1Michael K McLendon, James C Hearn, Russ Deaton. Called to Account: Analyzing the Origins and Spread of State Per- formance-Accountability Policies for Higher Education.E- ducational Evaluation and Policy Analysis. Spring 2006. Vol. 28, No. 1:1-24.
  • 2Joseph C. Burke, Shahpar Modarresi. Performance Funding Programs: Assessing Their Stability. Research in Higher Education. 2001, volume 42, November 1: 51 -70.
  • 3Tennessee Higher Education Fact Book 2010-2011 [EB/OL]. http://www.state.tn.us/thec/Legislative/Reports/2011/2010- 11%20Fact%20Book.PDF. 2011-04-24.
  • 4孙志军,金平.国际比较及启示:绩效拨款在高等教育中的实践[J].高等教育研究,2003,24(6):88-92. 被引量:38
  • 5Tennessee Higher Education Commission. 2010-2015 Performance Funding Quality Assurance [ EB/OL ]. http:// tennesseegov/moa/documents/perf_fund task force/THEC% 20PF%202010-15%20Guidebook.pdf.July, 2010: 3.2011- 04-24.
  • 6Objective [ EB/OL].http://www.tn.gov/moa/strGrp_prefFund. shtml. 2011-04-24.
  • 7Performance Funding 2005-2010 Standards [EB/OL]. http ://tn. gov/thec/Divisions/AcademicAffairs/Performa- nceFunding/performance_pdfs/PF_2005 - 10_Cycle_Stand ards.pdf. 2010-12-23.
  • 8Performance Funding 2010-15 Approved Standards [ EB/ OL ].http://www.tn.gov/moa/documents/perf_fund_ task_ force/THEC % 20PF % 202010-15 % 20Guidebook. pdf. 2011-04-24.
  • 9郑晓凤.美国高等教育绩效拨款特征——以田纳西州为例[J].中国高等教育评估,2006,19(2):43-46. 被引量:9

二级参考文献10

  • 1田文慧.如何考核高等教育的绩效责任[J].世界教育信息,2005,18(2):48-53. 被引量:5
  • 2丁小浩.高等教育财政危机与成本补偿[J].高等教育研究,1996,17(2):37-43. 被引量:43
  • 3Brown, Byron W. Why Governments Run Schools[J]. Economics of Education Review, 1992, 11, (4) :287-300.
  • 4Kaiser, Frans, Hans Vossensteyn, Jos Koelman.Public funding of higher education: A comparative study of funding mechanisms in ten countries[-Z]. Center for Higher Education Policy Studies, University of Twente. 2002.
  • 5Levacic, Rosalind, Kenneth Ross, Brian Caldwell.Funding Schools by Formula.. Comparing Practice in Five Countries [J]. Journal of Education Finance (Spring), 2002.
  • 6Catherine Watt,Carol Lancaster,James Gilbert,Thomas Higerd. Performance Funding and Quality Enhancement at Three Research Universities in the United States[J] 2004,Tertiary Education and Management(1):61~72
  • 7Joseph C. Burke,Shahpar Modarresi. Performance Funding Programs: Assessing Their Stability[J] 2001,Research in Higher Education(1):51~70
  • 8Daniel T. Layzell. LINKING PERFORMANCE TO FUNDING OUTCOMES AT THE STATE LEVEL FOR PUBLIC INSTITUTIONS OF HIGHER EDUCATION: Past, Present, and Future[J] 1999,Research in Higher Education(2):233~246
  • 9布鲁斯.约翰斯通.高等教育财政与管理:世界改革现状报告[J].高等教育研究,1999,20(6):5-11. 被引量:50
  • 10吴建南,李贵宁.教育财政支出绩效评价:模型及其通用指标体系构建[J].西安交通大学学报(社会科学版),2004,24(2):25-31. 被引量:92

共引文献44

同被引文献90

引证文献13

二级引证文献85

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部