期刊文献+

域间多路径路由协议 被引量:6

Inter-Domain Multipath Routing Protocols
下载PDF
导出
摘要 边界网关协议(border gateway protocol,简称BGP)是当前互联网的核心协议,但是由于BGP是一种单路径路由协议,所以仍存在可靠性差、无法有效使用次优路径以及负载均衡支持较弱等问题.域间多路径路由可以通过发挥底层网络的AS级路径多样性,提高域间路由的可靠性、报文分组转发的总体性能和整个网络资源的利用率.因此,域间多路径路由是解决上述BGP问题的一种有效手段,符合互联网应用不断深入、促进路由技术发展的需求.主要综述域间多路径协议,并将其分为3类:单径通告多路转发协议、多径通告多路转发协议和新型域间多路径路由体系结构.提出路径多样性、控制平面和数据平面开销、无环路特性等8项主要路由系统性能指标,并比较、分析了域间多路径路由协议.最后,指出域间多路径路由协议面临的主要挑战和未来的研究方向. BGP (border gateway protocol) is widely known for some problems in terms of poor reliability, suboptimal path use, and insufficient support for load balancing because it is a single-path routing protocol. Inter-Domain multipath routing explores the underlying network AS-level path diversity to improve the Internet's reliability, performance, and resource utilizaition. Thus, inter-domain multipath routing is considered a useful and necessary method to address the problems faced by BGP. This paper surveys current proposals on inter-domain multipath routing protocols and classifies these protocols into three categories: Protocols on a single announcement and multipath forwarding, protocols on multiple announcements and multipath forwarding, and new Internet routing architecture based protocols. They are compared under some different features of path diversity, control message overhead, loop-freeness property, etc. In addition to a review of existing protocols, the challenges in designing new inter-domain multipath routing protocols that could be taken as the future research direction are pointed out.
出处 《软件学报》 EI CSCD 北大核心 2012年第1期65-81,共17页 Journal of Software
基金 国家自然科学基金(61070199 61003301) 国家重点基础研究发展计划(973)(2009CB320503)
关键词 边界网关协议(BGP) 域间多路径路由 网络性能 网络可靠性 BGP (border gateway protocol) inter-domain multipath routing network performance networkreliability
  • 相关文献

参考文献35

  • 1Rekhter Y, Li T, Hares S. A border gateway protocol 4 (BGP-4). RFC 4271, 2006.
  • 2Labovitz C, Ahuja A, Bose A, Jahanian F. Delayed Internet routing convergence. ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review, 2000,30(4): 175-187. [doi: 10.1145/347057.347428].
  • 3Rexford J, Wang J, Xiao Z, Zhang Y. BGP routing stability of popular destinations. In: Proc. of the 2nd ACM SIGCOMM Workshop on Internet Measurement (IMW 2002). New York: ACM Press, 2002. 197-202. [doi: 10.1145/637201.637232].
  • 4Kushman N, Kandula S, Katabi D. Can you hear me now?! It must be BGP. ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review, 2007,37(2):75-84. Idol: 10.1145/1232919.1232927].
  • 5Moy J. RFC2328: OSPF Version 2. 1998.
  • 6Callon R. RFC 1195: Use of OSI IS-IS for routing in TCP/IP and dual environments. 1990.
  • 7Wang F, Mao ZM, Wang J, Gao LX, Bush R. A measurement study on the impact of routing events on end-to-end Intemet path performance. ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review, 2006,36(4):375-386. [ doi: 10.1145/1159913.1159956].
  • 8Bremler-Barr A, Afek Y, Schwarz S. Improved BGP convergence via ghost flushing. In: Proe. of the 22nd IEEE INFOCOM Annual Joint Conf. of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies, Vol.2. 2003. 927-937. [doi: 10.1109/1NFCOM.2003. 1208930].
  • 9Luo JB, Xie JQ, Hao RZ, Li X. An approach to accelerate convergence for path vector protocol. In: Proc. of the IEEE Global Telecommunications Conf., Vol.3.2002. 2390-2394. [doi: 10.1109/GLOCOM.2002.1189059].
  • 10Pei D, Zhao XL, Wang L, Massey D, Mankin A, Su SF, Zhang LX. Improving BGP convergence through consistency assertions. In: Proc. of the 21st IEEE INFOCOM Annual Joint Conf. of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies, Vol.2.2002. 902-911. [doi: 10.1109/INFCOM.2002.1019337].

同被引文献68

引证文献6

二级引证文献7

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部