期刊文献+

情绪、社会价值取向对分配公平观的影响 被引量:6

The Influence of Emotion and Social Value Orientations on Distributional Fairness
下载PDF
导出
摘要 采用最后通牒博弈实验和独裁者博弈实验考察了情绪、社会价值取向、博弈顺序对分配公平观的影响。结果发现:社会价值取向对个体在两次博弈中的提议数额都产生极其显著的影响,与亲社会取向个体相比,亲自我取向个体在两次博弈中的出价更低,更关注自我获益。情绪对最后通牒博弈提议数额影响显著,和愤怒情绪个体相比,愉快情绪个体出价更高。博弈顺序对提议数额影响不显著,但是和社会价值取向的交互作用对独裁者博弈影响显著。 This article examines the effects of emotion, social value orientation and game order on distributive fairness by Ultimatum Game and Dictator Game. The resuh shows: social value orientation displays significant effects on individual offers in two Games ; individuals with pro-self orientation give fewer offers in both Games and are more concerned about self- interest than individuals with pro-social orientation; emotion displays significantly influences on offers in Ultimatum Game; individuals offers more money to others when they are in a pleasure state; Game order has no significant effects on offers, but the interaction between game order and social value orientation significantly influences the offers in Dictator Game.
作者 方学梅 陈松
出处 《软科学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2011年第12期129-132,共4页 Soft Science
基金 国家社会科学基金项目(07BSH053) 上海市重点学科建设项目(B501)
关键词 分配公平 情绪 社会价值取向 最后通牒博弈 distributive fairness emotion social value orientation Ultimatum Game
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1Forsythe R, Horowitz J L, Savin N E, et al. Fairness in Simple Bargaining Experiments[ J]. Games and Economics Behavior, 1994,6.
  • 2皇甫刚,朱莉琪,戴航,张岗英.影响博弈结果的方法效应研究[J].心理与行为研究,2007,5(4):305-308. 被引量:8
  • 3陈曦,马剑虹,时勘.绩效、能力、职位对组织分配公平观的影响[J].心理学报,2007,39(5):901-908. 被引量:18
  • 4刘毅,李文琼.社会价值取向及其测量方法[J].山西经济管理干部学院学报,2008,16(1):80-82. 被引量:5
  • 5Van Lange, P A De Cremer D, Van Dijk E, Van Vugt M. From Aggression to Altruism : Basic Principles of Social Interaction [ A ]. E T Higgins, A W Kruglanski. Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles [ M]. New York: Guilford Press,2007:540 -561.
  • 6李静 卢家媚.不同调节方式对记忆的影响.心理学报,2007,:1084-1092.
  • 7Martin A, Karen M, Karl S. Fairness Versus Reason in the Ultimatum Game[J]. Science. 2000,289, 1773 - 1775.
  • 8Van Dijk E, De Cremer D, Handgraaf M J J. Social Value Orientations and the Strategic Use of Fairness in Ultimatum Bargaining [ J ]. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 2004,40(6) :697 -707.
  • 9Pillutla M M, Murnighan J K. Unfairness, Anger and Spite: Emotional Rejections of Ultimatum Offers [ J]. Organizational Bhehavior and Human Decision Processes, 1996, 68 (3) :208 -224.
  • 10Harle K M, Sanfey A G. Incidengtal Sadness Biases Social Economic Decisions in the Ultimatum Game [ J ]. Emotion, 2007,7 (4), 876-881.

二级参考文献26

共引文献29

同被引文献61

引证文献6

二级引证文献19

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部