期刊文献+

不同肾造瘘管及固定方式对肾结石合并肾功能不全患者术后并发症的影响 被引量:7

Impacts of different nephrostomy tubes and their fixation ways on patients with nephrolithiasis complicated with renal insufficiency after percutaneous nephrolithotomy
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨不同直径的肾造瘘管及固定方式对肾结石合并肾功能不全患者经皮肾镜碎石术后并发症的影响。方法:采用随机研究方法,根据造瘘管直径和固定方式不同随机分为3组:Ⅰ组,14 Fr球囊硅胶引流管(Uro-vision)牵拉组;Ⅱ组,14 Fr球囊硅胶引流管(Urovision)不牵拉组;Ⅲ组,20 Fr无球囊乳胶引流管不牵拉组。对所有患者术前检测血清肌酐、血红蛋白、中段尿培养结果、术侧结石体积,术中记录手术时间、穿刺通道数目,计算术后24 h、72 h血红蛋白变化值,记录术后是否出现尿外渗、全身炎症反应综合征、应用毒麻药和输血情况。结果:共入选72例肾功能不全患者,每组24例。3组间在尿外渗(P=0.301)、全身炎症反应综合征(P=0.099)及应用毒麻药方面差异无统计学意义(P=0.898)。在术后24 h和72 h Hb变化值方面,Ⅰ组与Ⅱ组(P=0.001,P=0.009)、Ⅰ组与Ⅲ组(P=0.021,P=0.003)之间差异有统计学意义,Ⅱ组与Ⅲ组之间差异无统计学意义(P=0.989,P=0.962)。3组术后输血例数由低到高依次为:Ⅰ组(1例)、Ⅲ组(6例)、Ⅱ组(10例),Ⅰ组明显低于Ⅱ组(P=0.002),Ⅲ组与Ⅰ组(P=0.102)、Ⅲ组与Ⅱ组(P=0.221)之间差异无统计学意义。结论:留置14 Fr球囊硅胶肾造瘘管并牵拉压迫穿刺通道的引流方式,有利于减少结石合并肾功能不全患者术后24 h及72 h的出血量,值得推荐。 Objective:To investigate impacts of different nephrostomy tubes and their fixation ways on patients with nephrolithiasis complicated with renal insufficiency after percutaneous nephrolithotomy.Methods: A total of 72 renal insufficiency patients were enrolled in this study,who were randomized into three groups with 24 patients in each group according to nephrostomy tube diameter and its fixation way: Group Ⅰ,i.e.stretch group with 14 Fr silicon tube(Urovision)with balloon;Group Ⅱ,i.e.not strech group with 14 Fr silicon tube(Urovision)with balloon;Group Ⅲ,i.e.not strech group with 20Fr latex tube without balloon.The data collected included preoperative serum cretinine,hemoglobin value,midstream urine culture,stone volume,and operative time,and number of operative tract.It was also recorded that the change of hemoglobin between preoperation and 24 h or 72 h postoperation,presence of postoperative extravasation,systemic inflammatory respose syndrome,narcotic usage and blood transfusion.Results: There were no statistically significant differences among the three groups in terms of the incidence of postooperative extravasation(P=0.301),SIRS(P=0.099) and narcotic usage(P=0.898).In the aspects of the change of hemoglobin between preoperation and 24 h or 72 h postoperation,there were significant differences between group Ⅰ and groupⅡ(P=0.001,P=0.009) or group Ⅲ(P=0.021,P=0.003).No difference was found between groups Ⅱ and Ⅲ(P=0.989,P=0.962).In the aspect of blood transfusion cases,group Ⅰ(1 case)group Ⅲ(6 cases)group Ⅱ(10 cases).The number of patients needing blood transfusion in group Ⅰ was significantly lower than that in group Ⅱ(P=0.002),but the differences between group Ⅲ and group Ⅰ(P=0.102) or group Ⅱ(P=0.221) were not statistically significant.Conclusion: It is worth recommending indwelling 14 Fr silicon nephrostomy tube with balloon oppressing the operative tracts,because it could reduce blood loss 24 h and 72 h after operation in patients with nephrolithiasis complicated with renal insufficiency.
出处 《北京大学学报(医学版)》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2011年第6期878-881,共4页 Journal of Peking University:Health Sciences
关键词 肾结石 肾功能不全 肾造口术 经皮 手术后并发症 Kidney calculi Renal insufficiency Nephrostomy percutaneous Postoperative complications
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1Maranggella M,Bruno M,Cosseddu D,et al.Prevalence of chronic renal insufficiency in the course of idiopathic recurrent calcium stone disease:risk factors and patterns of progression[J].Nephron,1990,54(4):302-306.
  • 2Gupta M,Bolton DM,Gupta PN,et al.Improved renal function following aggressive treatment of urolithiasis and concurrent mild to moderate renal insufficiency[J].J Urol,1994,152(4):1086-1090.
  • 3Kukreja R,Desai M,Patel SH,et al.Nephrolithiasis associated with renal insufficiency:factors predicting outcome[J].J Endourol,2003,17(10):875-879.
  • 4A1-Kohlany KM,Shokeir AA,Mosbah A,et al.Treatment of complete staghom stones:a prospective randomized comparison of open surgery versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy[J].J Urol,2005,173 (2):469-473.
  • 5Zehri AA,Biyabani SR,Siddiqui KM,et al.Triggers of blood transfusion in percutaneous nephrolithotomy[J].J Coll Physicians Surg Pak,2011,21 (3):138-141.
  • 6Marcovich R,Jacobson AI,Singh J,et al.No panacea for drainage after percutaneous nephrolithotomy[J].J Endourol,2004,18(8):743-747.
  • 7刘勇,王佳,魏强,沈朋飞,黄晓科.经皮肾镜取石术后D-J管与传统肾造瘘管引流效果的系统评价[J].中国循证医学杂志,2009,9(2):230-238. 被引量:9
  • 8Agrawal MS and Agrawal M.Tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy[J].Indian J Urol,2010,26(1):16-24.

二级参考文献24

  • 1Winfield HN, Weyman P, Clayman RV. Percutaneous nephrostolithotomy: Complications of premature nephrostomy tube removal. ] Urol, 1986, 136: 77-79.
  • 2Bellman GC, Davidoff R, Candela J, et al. Tubeless per-cutaneous renal surgery. ] Urol, 1997, 157:1578-1582.
  • 3Pietrow PK, Auge BK, Lallas CD. Pain after percutaneous nephrolithotomy: impact of nephrostomy tube size. J Endourol, 2003, 17(6): 411-414.
  • 4Maheshwari PN, Andankar MG, Bansal M. Nephrostomy tube after percutaneous nephrolithotomy: large-bore or pigtail catheter? J Endourol, 2000, 14(9): 735-737.
  • 5Higgins JPT, Green S, editors. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions 4.2.6 [updated September 2006]. The Cochrane Library, Issue 4, 2006. Chichester, UK: JohnWiley & sons, Ltd.
  • 6Desai MR, Kukreia RA, Desai MM, et al. A prospective randomized comparison of type of nephrostomy drainage following percutaneous nephrostolithotomy: large bore versus small bore versus tubeless, J Urol, 2004, 172 (2): 565-567.
  • 7Feng MI, Tamaddon K, Mikhail A, et al. Prospective randomized study of various techniques of percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Urology, 2001, 58(3): 345-350.
  • 8Choi M, Brusky J, Weaver J, et al. Randomized trial comparing modified tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy with tailed stent with percutaneous nephrostomy with small-bore tube. J Endourol, 2006, 20(10): 766-770.
  • 9Sofikerim M, Demirci D, Huri E, et al. Tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy: safe even in supracostal access. J Endourol, 2007, 21(9): 967-972.
  • 10Marcovich R,Jacobson AI, Singh J, et al. No panacea for drainage after percutaneous nephrolithotomy. J Endourol, 2004, 18(8): 743-747.

共引文献8

同被引文献92

  • 1李建兴,田溪泉,牛亦农,张鑫,康宁.B超引导经皮肾镜气压弹道联合超声碎石术治疗无积水肾结石[J].中华外科杂志,2006,44(6):386-388. 被引量:178
  • 2何永忠,刘建河,曾国华,袁坚,李逊,何朝辉.微创经皮肾镜取石术后迟发出血原因及介入治疗[J].中华泌尿外科杂志,2006,27(6):371-373. 被引量:164
  • 3TURK C, KNOLL T, PETRIK A, et al. Guidelines on urolith-iasis. Chapter 6. 4: selection of procedure for active removal ofkidney stones[M]. Presented at Vienna, Austria; 26th Europe-an Association of Urology Congress. 2011 : 18-22.
  • 4SEMINS MJ,BARTIK L, CHEW BH, et al. Multicenter analy-sis of postoperative CT findings after percutaneous nephrolithot-omy: defining complication rates[J]. Urology, 2011,78: 291-294.
  • 5DE LA ROSETTE J, ASSIMOS D, DESAI M, et al. The clini-cal research office of the endourological society percutaneousnephrolithotomy global study: indications, complications, andoutcomes in 5803 patients[J]. J Endourol,2011,25:11-17.
  • 6RESORLU B, KARA C,SENOCAK C,et al. Effect of previ-ous open renal surgery and failed extracorporeal shockwave litho-tripsy on the performance and outcomes of percutaneous nephro-lithotomy^]. J Endourol,2010,24: 13-16.
  • 7GUPTA NP, MISHRA S, NAYYAR R, et al. Comparative a-nalysis of percutaneous nephrolithotomy in patients with andwithout a history of open stone surgery: single center experience[J]. J Endourol,2009,23:913-916.
  • 8WEZEL F, MAMOULAKIS C, RIOJA J,et al. Two contempo-rary series of percutaneous tract dilation for percutaneous neph-rolithotomy[J], J Endourol,2009,23 : 1655-1661.
  • 9LIANG CHEN, QING-QUAN XU, JIAN-XING LI, et al_ As-sessing risk factors of systemic inflammatory response syndromeafter percutaneous nephrolithotomy[J]. Int Urol, 2008,15:1025-1028.
  • 10SINGH I,SINGH A, MITTAL G. Tubeless percutaneousnephrolithotomy: is it really less morbid? [J]. J Endourol,2008,22:427-434.

引证文献7

二级引证文献77

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部