摘要
目的:对比普鲁卡因与垂体后叶素治疗大咯血的止血效果和不良反应。方法:回顾性分析2006年3月到2011年2月间收治的36例普鲁卡因治疗的大咯血病人以及32例垂体后叶素治疗的大咯血病人。结果:普鲁卡因治疗和垂体后叶素治疗对病人的止血效果无统计学差异(P>0.05),但垂体后叶素治疗的不良反应明显高于普鲁卡因(P<0.05)。结论:在垂体后叶素不能使用时,普鲁卡因是治疗大咯血有效且安全的药物。
Objective: To investigate clinical efficiency of the treatment of severe hemoptysis with procaine and pituitrin,and to provide experience and clinical reference for treatment of severe hemoptysis in basic hospital.Methods: 36 cases of severe hemoptysis treated with procaine and 32 cases of severe hemoptysis treated with pituitrin were retrospective analyzed from March 2006 to February 2011.Results: The emergent hemostatic rate treated with procaine and pituitrin was not different significantly(P0.05),adverse reactions of pituitrin was markedly higher than procaine(P0.05).Conclusion: Procaine was effective and safe drug for the treatment of severe hemoptysis besides pituitrin.
出处
《四川生理科学杂志》
2011年第4期172-174,共3页
Sichuan Journal of Physiological Sciences
关键词
咯血
垂体后叶素
普鲁卡因
治疗
Severe hemoptysis
Procaine
Pituitrin
Treatment