期刊文献+

腹腔镜手术治疗直肠癌50例疗效观察 被引量:7

The clinical efficacy of laparoscopic rectal resection in 50 patients with rectal cancer
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探析腹腔镜手术与开腹直肠癌根治术治疗直肠癌的效果。方法回顾性分析本科收治的90例直肠癌患者的临床资料,随机分为两组,开腹组(n=40)行开腹直肠癌根治术,腹腔镜组(n=50)采用腹腔镜根治术治疗,比较两组患者围手术期各项指标差异。结果两组患者的平均手术时间比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);腹腔镜组的术中出血量、术后肠功能恢复时间、住院时间均优于开腹组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);开腹组发生手术并发症共12例(30.0%),腹腔镜组手术并发症4例(8.6%),腹腔镜组手术并发症发生率低于开腹组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论腹腔镜直肠癌切除术是治疗直肠癌的理想术式,具有手术创伤小、恢复快、并发症发生率低的优点。 Objective To evaluate the clinical effect between iapamscopic and open radical operation in patients with rectal cancer. Methods 90 cases were divided into 2 groups by random. The open resection group ( n = 40) took the pen radical operation. The laparoscopic rectal resection group ( n = 50) took laparoscopic rectal resection. The results after the operation between 2 groups of patients were compared. Results There was no significant different between 2 groups in the average operative duration ( P 〉 0. 05 ). The bleeding of vagina and the recovery time of bowel motility and the length of stay of the laparoscopic rectal resection group were much better than the open resection group ( P 〈 0. 05 ). The complications rates of the laparoscopic rectal resection group were much lower than the open resection group (P 〈 0. 05 ). Conclusion The laparoscopic rectal resection is the treatment of rectal cancer in the operation, with less trauma, quicker recovery, complication rate is low. it can be applied to patients with rectal cancer.
出处 《中国医学创新》 CAS 2011年第36期46-47,共2页 Medical Innovation of China
关键词 腹腔镜 直肠癌 根治术 临床效果 Lapamscopes Rectal cancer Rectal resection Clinical eff/cacy
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献63

  • 1万崇华,陈明清,张灿珍,汤学良,孟琼,张晓磬.癌症患者生命质量测定量表EORTC QLQ-C30中文版评介[J].实用肿瘤杂志,2005,20(4):353-355. 被引量:1271
  • 2程应东,梁平,张朝军,罗云生.腹腔镜下手术切除结直肠癌的临床分析[J].中国普通外科杂志,2005,14(12):883-886. 被引量:20
  • 3郑民华.腹腔镜直肠系膜全切除术的应用与评价[J].上海交通大学学报(医学版),2007,27(5):488-490. 被引量:14
  • 4Gao F, Cao YF, Chen LS. Meta-analysis of short-term outcomes after laparoscopic resection for rectal cancer. Int J Colorectal Dis,2006, 21:652 -656.
  • 5Hixson T,Bergamaschi R. Laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Eur Surg, 2006,38:390 - 392.
  • 6Jadad AR, Moore RA, Carroll D, et al. Assessing the quality of report of randomized clinical trails: is blinding necessary? Controlled Clin Trails,1996,17:1 - 12.
  • 7Braga M, Frasson M, Vignali A, et al. Laparoscopic vs. open colectomy in cancer patients : long-term complications, quality of life, and survival. Dis Colon Rectum ,2005,48:2217 - 2223.
  • 8Braga M, Frasson M, Vignali A, et al.Laparoscopic resection in rectal cancer patients: outcome and cost-benefit analysis. Dis Colon Rectum, 2007,50 : 464 - 471.
  • 9Guillou PJ, Quirke P, Thorpe H, et al. Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with eolorectal cancer ( MRC CLASICC trial ) : multicentre, randomized controlled trial. Laneet, 2005,365 : 1718 - 1726.
  • 10Yeldkamp R, Kuhry E, Hop WC, et al. Laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: short-term outcomes of a randomized trial. Lancet Oncol, 2005,6:477 - 484.

共引文献100

同被引文献80

引证文献7

二级引证文献51

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部