期刊文献+

论跨国公司环境侵权的法律调整路径 被引量:1

Legal Regulation Path of Environment Tort in Multinational Corporations
下载PDF
导出
摘要 跨国公司在当今世界经济活动中扮演着重要角色,也带来了大量的环境问题。追求全球范围内的利润最大化是其环境侵权的最主要原因。跨国公司环境侵权责任最初是被置于国家责任框架下进行探讨的,然而,要求国家对本国私法主体的环境损害行为承担国家责任,往往难以为各国接受,国际环境责任出现了由国家责任向民事侵权责任转变的趋势。调整国际环境侵权责任的统一实体法条约覆盖领域十分有限,侵权行为地法在解决国际环境损害赔偿纠纷中依然占有非常重要的地位。侵权的一般规则不足以调整特殊侵权,应制定环境侵权的特殊规则。法院在选择法律时应选择对受害人有利的法律。 Multinational corporations play important roles and bring more environmental problems in world economic activities. The main reasons are to pursue world-wlde profit maximization. The environment tort responsibility involving multinational corporations is first discussed under national responsibility, while it is very difficult for the countries to take the responsibility of environmental damages that their private enterprises cause, hence, international environmental responsibility tends to be civil tort one. However, because the real united provisions can not cover all international environment tort responsibility, the local law on tort behaviors is more important to solve compensation dispute on international environment damage. But special regulations on environment tort are needed because universal regulations can not settle the special tort, and the court should choose the law favorable to victims.
作者 王爽 王荣华
出处 《商业经济》 2012年第2期119-121,共3页 Business & Economy
基金 2011哈尔滨理工大学青年科学研究基金项目:跨国公司环境侵权的责任承担与追究
关键词 跨国公司 环境侵权责任 法律调整路径 multinational corporations, environment tort responsibility, path of legal regulation
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献23

  • 1那力,张炀.国际环境损害责任的私法化[J].当代法学,2004,18(4):113-119. 被引量:17
  • 2王曦.论“国际法未加禁止之行为引起有害后果之国际责任”[J].社会科学,2006(4):95-103. 被引量:14
  • 32000 ILC Draft Articles on State Responsibility, Art. 2;Ian Brownlie, State Responsibility, Oxford University Press, 1984, p. 37 {f.
  • 4Emilio Agustin Maffezini v. The Kingdom of Spain, ARB/97/7, Award, Nov. 9, 2000; para. 50.
  • 5Edwin Montefiore Borchard,The Diplomatic Protection of Citizens Abroad or the Law ot International Claims, New York .. Banks Law Publishing Co. , 1928. 718--20.
  • 6Alabama Claim Arbitration Moore, 1 Int. Arb. 495(1872).
  • 7中国政法大学国际法教研室编.《国际公法案例分析》.中国政法大学出版社,1995年版,第1-4页.
  • 8C. E. Amerasinghe, State Responsibility for Injuries to Aliens, Clarenton Press: Oxford, 1967; R. B. Lillich, International Law of State Responsibility, Charlottesville: Univ. Press of Virginia, 1983.
  • 9F. V. Garcia--Amador, Changing Law of.International Claims, Oceana, 1984.
  • 10Mavrommatis Palestine Concessions case,(1924)PCIJ Serie A, No. 2, 12.

共引文献16

同被引文献3

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部