期刊文献+

美国网络服务商商标协助侵权责任的认定——基于Tiffany公司诉eBay公司案的分析 被引量:2

Assertion of Trademark Assisting Tortious Liability for Network Service Provider in America ——A case analysis based on Tiffany company prosecuting eBay company
下载PDF
导出
摘要 Tiffany公司诉eBay公司案中,美国法院判定网络服务商应当承担商标协助侵权责任的基础是其具有合理的获知能力,即已知或应知具体的第三人的侵权行为,而不仅仅是总体获知侵权行为的存在。如果已知或应知第三人的侵权行为而继续为其提供服务则应承担侵权责任,反之则无需承担侵权责任;但如果对第三人的侵权行为有意视而不见,则仍应承担侵权责任。本案判决对美国的网络交易发展产生重要影响。目前我国对于网络服务商的侵权责任认定存在分歧,本案的判决对我国有一定的借鉴意义。 In the case of Tiffany company prosecuting eBay company,The base,in which the court of US judges that the network service provider should undertakes the trademark assisting tortuous liability,has reasonable learning ability,namely it knew or knew more about the infringing act of the third side in detail,and not only there is the infringing act learned in general.If it knew or knew about and continued to provide the service for provider then it should undertake the tortuous liability.Otherwise it is unnecessary to undertake the tortuous liability.But it has a mind to turn a blind eye for the infringing act of the third side then it should still undertake the tortuous liability.The judging of case results in important effects for network trade development of US.At present,there is the difference between tortious liability undertaking in network service provider of our country.This adjudicate has a certain mirror significance for our country.
作者 杨建锋
出处 《重庆理工大学学报(社会科学)》 CAS 2011年第12期17-22,共6页 Journal of Chongqing University of Technology(Social Science)
基金 上海市教育委员会科研创新项目09YZ283阶段性成果之一 上海市教委重点学科食品经济管理(J50703)资助支持 上海海洋大学人文社科项目 博士科研启动基金
关键词 网络服务商 商标 协助侵权责任 network service provider trademark assisting tortious liability known or knew about
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

  • 1Ginsburg Jane C. Trademark and Unfair Competition Law: Cases and Materials [ M ]. 10 edition. [ S. l. ]: Foundation Press ,2010.
  • 2Auction Websites Hang in Legal Limbo By David Kravets, Wired News [ EB/OL ]. [ 2011 - 06 - 15 ]. http :// www. eff. org/press/mentions/2008/12/4 -0.
  • 3Jewelry Company Quest to Expand Trademark Law Could Quash Internet Commerce [ EB/OL ]. [ 2011 - 06 - 15 ]. http ://www. eft. org/press/arehives/2008/12/03.
  • 4Court sides with LVMH over eBay[ EB/OL]. [ 2011 -06 -15 ]. http://www, nytimes, com/2008/06/30/technology/30iht-lvmh. 4. 14109529. html.
  • 5eBay Sued for Bogus Rolex Auctions[ EB/OL]. [2011 - 06 - 15]. http://www, ecommercetimes, com/story/ 9770. html.
  • 6杨建锋.商标注册国际协调制度构建之法理探析[J].重庆理工大学学报(社会科学),2010,24(7):17-23. 被引量:2

二级参考文献11

  • 1Max Vern. A Trademark Visa-Aspect of International Trademark Use and Protection [ J ]. Journal of the Patent and Trademark Office Society, 2006, October:52.
  • 2张乃根,陆飞.知识经济与知识产权法[M].上海:复旦大学出版社,2004.
  • 3Gustavo Bravo. From Paris Convention to TRIPS: A Brief History [ J ]. Journal of Contemporary Legal Issues, 2001(2) :445.
  • 4Kenneth L, Port. Trademark Harmonizaiton : Norms, Names & Nonsense [ J]. Marquette Intellectual Property Law Review, 1998(2) :33 -50.
  • 5Harriet R, Freeman. Reshaping Trademark Protection in Today' s Global Village: Looking beyond GATT's Uruguay Round toward Global Trademark Harmonization and Centralization [ J ]. ILSA Journal of International and Comparative Law, 1995, Spring:69 - 70.
  • 6Beth Fulkerson. Theft by Terrorism:A Case for Revising TRIPS to Protect Trademark from National Market Foreclosure[J]. Michigan Journal of International Law, 1996.
  • 7James A, Carney. Setting Sights on Trademark Piracy: the Need for Greater Protection against Imitation of Foreign Trademark [ J]. The Trademark Reporter, 1991, January-February : 31 - 35.
  • 8Nuno Pires de Carvalho. The Trips Regime of Trademark and Design [ M ]. Kluwer Law International, 2006.
  • 9211节综合拨款法案专家组报告与上诉机构报告[EB/OL].[2008-06-01]:http://www.wto.org//english/tratop_e/dispu_e/cases_e/ds176_e.htm.
  • 10北京市高级人民法院行政判决书(2007)高行政终字第108号[EB/OL].[2008-06-21]:http://www.lawtime.cn/info/wenshu/pjxzcpwsersherr/2007070545714.html.

共引文献1

引证文献2

二级引证文献10

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部