银质针温针与普通针温针对原发性痛经疗效对比观察

Comparative Study on the Treatment of Primary Dysmenorrheal with Warm Needling Therapy by Silver-made Needles and Ordinary Needles

目的观察银质针温针与普通针温针治疗原发性痛经的临床疗效、止痛起效时间、复发情况。方法将患者随机分为银针组和普通组,观察原发性痛经的临床疗效。结果银针组与普通组治疗后症状总评分比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.01),银针组止痛起效时间明显快于普通组,复发率明显低于普通组(均P<0.01)。结论 银质针温针对原发性痛经疗效优于普通针温针治疗。

Objective To observe the clinical effect, action time of relieving pain, and recurrence in treating primary dysmenorrheal with warm needling method by silver-made needles and ordinary needles. Method The patients were randomized into a silver-made needle group and an ordinary needle group, to assess the clinical effect in treating primary dysmenorrheal. Result The difference of general symptom score between the silver-made needle group and the ordinary needle group was statistically significant （P〈0.01）. The action time of relieving pain in the silver-made needle group was significantly earlier than that in the ordinary needle group, but the recurrence rate in the silver-made needle group was markedly higher than that in the ordinary needle group （both P〈0.01）. Conclusion The therapeutic effect of warm needling method with silver-made needle is better than that with the ordinary needle in treating primary dysmenorrheal.