摘要
劝返作为引渡的替代性措施之一,早在2007年的胡星案中就成功使用过。劝返较引渡和引渡的其他替代性措施,确实存在一系列优势,但它的困境也是显而易见的:其前提性条件的具备何其艰难;其是否像有的学者所说的那样应认定为自首;为何杨湘洪至今未被劝返。总之,充分比较劝返的利弊之后,我们是否继续不遗余力地对劝返措施进行提倡,如果提倡的话,如何提倡,则是不得不面对的问题。
Persuasion to return to china as an alternative means of extradition,is used successfully in the case of Hu Xing in 2007.Compared to extradition and the alternative means of extradition,persuasion has a series of advantages.However,there also exit many problems as follows.It's difficult to have the prerequisite;whether it should be seen as surrendering as some scholar said;why Yang Xianghong hasn't been persuaded to return to china till now.In brief,comparing the pros and cons fully,we must confront the questions: should we continue to spare no efforts to promote the measures? If we decide to use this measure,how to make good use of it ?
出处
《潍坊教育学院学报》
2011年第5期7-10,共4页
Journal of Weifang Educational College
关键词
劝返
引渡的替代性措施
困境
《劝返条例》
persuasion to return to china
an alternative means of extradition
dilemma
rules of persuasion