期刊文献+

抑制性进言、冲突类型与企业绩效的关系研究

下载PDF
导出
摘要 抑制性进言是下级向上级提出的不同意见,甚至反对意见。尽管下级为谋求表面和谐不愿提出抑制性进言,但它是制定科学决策的宝贵资源。进言提出后要转化为现实绩效,还取决于对进言产生的冲突的管理有效性。抑制性进言确实对企业绩效具有显著的正向影响,更多反面或修正意见可提高前期决策的科学性。同时发现,合作式冲突和对抗式冲突都会显著正向调节抑制性进言与企业绩效的关系,进一步放大抑制性进言的积极作用,更高效地转化为绩效。还发现,让步式冲突是一种消极的冲突类型,其对抑制性进言与企业绩效的关系具有负向调节作用。结论要求管理者强化对合作式冲突或对抗式冲突氛围的塑造,激发下属提出自己的意见,释放出抑制性进言的绩效改善作用。
作者 郭骁
出处 《云南财经大学学报(社会科学版)》 2011年第6期40-44,共5页 Yunan Finance & Economics University Journal of Economics & Management
基金 国家社科基金项目(批准号10GBL041) 中央财经大学"中财121人才工程青年博士发展基金"资助(批准号QBJGL201013) 中央财经大学"211工程"三期项目课题
  • 相关文献

参考文献19

  • 1魏昕,张志学.组织中为什么缺乏抑制性进言?[J].管理世界,2010,26(10):99-109. 被引量:121
  • 2李子奈,齐良书.关于计量经济学模型方法的思考[J].中国社会科学,2010(2):69-83. 被引量:93
  • 3Blatt,R.Tough Love:How Communal Schemas and ContractingPractices Build Relational Capital in Entrepreneurial Teams. Academyof Management Review . 2009
  • 4Deutsch,M.Sixty Years of Conflict. The International Jour-nal of Conflict Management . 1990
  • 5Tjosvold,D.Cooperative and Competitive Goal Approach toConflict:Accomplishments and Challenges. Applied Psychology . 1998
  • 6Chen,G.Q,Liu,C.H,Tjosvold,D.Conflict Management forEffective Top Management Teams and Innovation in China. Journal ofManagement Studies . 2005
  • 7Barker,J,Tjosvold,D,Andrews,I.R.Conflict Approaches ofEffective and Ineffective Managers:A Field Study in a Matrix Organization. Journal of Management . 1988
  • 8Covin,J,D Slevin,R.Schultz.Implementing Strategic Mis-sions:Effective Strategic,Structural and Tactical Choices. Journal ofManagement Studies . 1994
  • 9Niehm,L.S.Retail Superpreneurs and Their Influence onSmall Communities. . 2002
  • 10Frazier,B.The Influence of Network Characteristics on Infor-mation Access,Marketing Competence and Perceptions of Performance inSmall,Rural Business. . 2000

二级参考文献66

  • 1洪永淼.计量经济学的地位、作用和局限[J].经济研究,2007,42(5):139-153. 被引量:130
  • 2Galinsky, A. D., Gruenfeld, D. H. and Magee, J. C., 2003, "From Power to Action", Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol.85, pp.453-486.
  • 3Gelfand, M. J. and McCusker, C., 2002, "Metaphor and the Cultural Construction of Negotiation: A Paradigm for Theory and Research", In M. Gannon and K. L. Newman (eds.), Handbook of Cross-Cultural Management, Blackwell, pp.292-314.
  • 4Hirschman, A. 0., 1970, "Exit, Voice and Loyalty: Response to Decline in Firms, Organizations and States", Harvard University Press.
  • 5Hofstede, G. H., 1950, Culture's Consequences: International Differences in Work-Related Values, Sage.
  • 6Huang, X., Van de Vliert, E. and Van der Vegt, G., 2005, "Breaking the Silence Culture: Stimulation of Participation and Employee Opinion withholding Cross-nationally", Management and Organization Review, Vol.1, pp.459-482.
  • 7Hwang, K. K., 2000, "Chinese Relationalism: Theoretical Construction and Methodological Considerations", Journal for the Theory of Social Behavior, Vol.30, pp.155-178.
  • 8Kipnis, D., 1972, "Does Power Corrupt?" Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 24, pp.33-41.
  • 9Kirkbride, P. S., Tang, S. and Westwood, R. I., 1991, "Chinese Conflict Preferences and Negotiation Behavior: Cultural and Psychological Influences", Organization Studies, Vol.12, pp. 365-386.
  • 10Kirkman, B. L., Chen, G., Farh, J. L., Chen, Z. X. and Lowe, K. B., 2009, "Individual power Distance Orientation and Follower Reactions to Transformational Leaders: A Cross-level, Cross-cultural Examination", Academy of Management Jounal, Vol.52, pp.744-764.

共引文献210

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部