期刊文献+

试论加强机关三大作风理论研究的现实意义 被引量:1

On the Theoretical Study Practice Significance of Strengthening the Organ Three Styles
下载PDF
导出
摘要 当前我国机关效能建设正处于全面推进与深化的阶段。机关作风建设作为党的作风建设极其重要的内容,它必须努力适应机关效能建设的时代要求而进行及时的理论创新。机关三大作风即思想作风、工作作风和生活作风是一个完整的理论体系,突出加强三大作风整体性的理论研探,既是三大作风内在逻辑的必然反映,还是当下全面深化机关效能建设的历史选择,更是继承、发展和践行党的优良作风的时代诉求。 At present,China's efficiency construction is at the stage of advancing and deepening overall.The style construction of organ,as Party's style construction very important content,must adapt to the requirement of the times of efficiency construction and conduct theoretical innovation promptly.Organ three styles that is the thought,work and life style is a complete theoretical system.Highlights enhancing three styles theoretical research as the integrity is not only must the internal logic reflect but also historical choice of deepening organ efficiency of at present,and more,it is the times demand of inherit,development and practice the Party's fine style.
作者 昂永生
机构地区 安徽行政学院
出处 《安徽行政学院学报》 2011年第6期32-36,共5页 Journal of Anhui Academy of Governance
基金 安徽省社科联资助项目"机关效能建设问题研究--以安徽省机关效能建设为例"(A2010024)
关键词 机关 效能建设 三大作风 理论创新 时代意义 organ efficiency construction three styles theoretical innovation time significance
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献21

  • 1吴建南,张翔.政府绩效的决定因素:观点述评、逻辑关系及研究方法[J].西安交通大学学报(社会科学版),2006,26(1):7-13. 被引量:22
  • 2吴建南,马亮,杨宇谦.中国地方政府创新的动因、特征与绩效——基于“中国地方政府创新奖”的多案例文本分析[J].管理世界,2007,23(8):43-51. 被引量:191
  • 3福建省机关效能建设领导小组办公室.福建省机关效能建设工作情况汇报(2010年9月6日)(内部资料).
  • 4Richard WaLker, George A. Boyne. Introduction: Determinants of Performance in Public Organizations. Public Administration, 2009, 87 (3) : 433-439.
  • 5Patricia W. Ingraham. Play it Again, Sam; It's Still Not Right: Searching for the Right Notes in Administrative Reform. Public Administration Review, 1997, 57 (4) : 325 - 331.
  • 6Christopher Pollitt, Geert Bouckaert. Public Management Reform : A Comparative Analysis. Oxford : Oxford University Press, 2000.
  • 7Sanford Borins. Public Management Innovation: Toward a Global Perspective. American Review of Public Administration, 2001, 31 (1): 5-21.
  • 8Eran Vigoda-Gadot, Aviv Shoham, Nitza Schwabsky. Public Sector Innovation for Europe: A Multinational Eight-Country Exploration of Citizens'Perspectives. Public Administration, 2008, 86 (2) : 307-329.
  • 9Carolyn J. Heinrich, Laurence E. Lynn, Jr. Means and Ends: A Comparative Study of Empirical Methods for Investigating Governance and Performance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 2001, I I (1) : 109-138.
  • 10Richard M. Walker, Wu Jiannan. Future Prospects for Performance Management in Chinese City Governments. Administration Society, 2010, 42 (1 suppl) : 34S-55S.

共引文献57

同被引文献15

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部