期刊文献+

作文前计划的时间因素对前计划效应的影响 被引量:8

INFLUENCE OF PRE-COMPOSITION PLANNING TIME ON THE PRE-COMPOSITION PLANNING EFFECT
下载PDF
导出
摘要 采用自然实验与实验室实验相结合的方法,通过两个实验探讨作文前计划的时间因素对前计划效应的影响。结果发现,作文方式决定前计划用时,前计划用时影响前计划效应,前计划效应决定前计划形式的作用。这一结果表明,在既有前计划又有外部视觉表征的情况下,前计划本身在前计划时限与前计划形式的关系中起着决定性的作用。因为前计划的存在,使外部视觉表征的作用呈现出更为复杂的情况,从而表现为长时限前计划即充分前计划条件下,外部视觉表征具有重要意义,短时限前计划即不充分前计划条件下,计划比外部视觉表征更具价值。 This paper attempted to study the influence of pre-composition planning time on the pre-compositionplanning effect by the method of combining natural experiment and laboratory experiment. Our studydiscovered that the composition form determined the planning time, which in turn influenced theplanning effect which then determined the composition form. This indicated that with both the plan andthe external representation, the plan itself played a decisive role in the relations between the limitedtime for planning and the planning form. A more complicated case about the effect of the externalrepresentation emerged when the plan existed, i. e. the external representation is of great significancewhen there is plenty of time for planning. In contrast, the plan is of greater significance than theexternal representation when there is not enough time to plan.
作者 刘淼 张必隐
机构地区 北京师范大学
出处 《心理学报》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2000年第1期70-74,共5页 Acta Psychologica Sinica
关键词 时间 外部视觉表征 作文 前计划效应 plan, time, form, external representation, composition.
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1[1]Reece J E, Cumming G. Evaluating Speech-Based Composition Methods: Planning, Dictation, and The Listening Word Processor. In: Levy M C, Ransdell S ed. The Science of Writing: Theories, Methods, Individual Differences, and Applications. Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1996. 361-380
  • 2[2]Sommers N I. Revision strategies of student writers and experienced adult writers. College Composition and Communication, 1980, 31:378-388
  • 3[3]Bereiter C, Scardamalia M. From conversation to composition: The role of instruction in a developmental process. In: Glaser R ed. Aduances in instructional psychology. Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1982.2:1-64
  • 4[4]Faigley L, Cherry R D, Jolliffe D A, Skinner A M. Assessing writers' knowledge and processes of composing. Norwood NJ: Ablex, 1985. 23-41
  • 5[5]Kellogg R T. Attentional overload and writing performance: Effects of rough draft and outline strategies. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 1988, 14:355-365
  • 6[6]Reece J E. Cognitive processes in the development of written composition skills: The role of planning, dictation, and computer tools. Unpublished doctoral thesis, La Trobe University. 1992
  • 7[7]Levy C M, Rozen L, Marek J P, Lea J. How will the word processors of 2005 affect writing? Paper presented at the International Conference of Writing and Computers, October, London. 1995, 10
  • 8[8]Grabowski J, Vorwerg C, Rummer R. Writing as a tool for control of episodic representation. In: Eigler G, Jechle Thed. Text production: Current trends in European research. Freiburg: Hochschulverlag, 1994. 55-68
  • 9[9]Grabowski J. Writing and Speaking: Common Grounds and Differences Toward a Regulation Theory of Written Language Probuction. In: Levy M C, Ransdell S ed. The Science of Writing: Theories, Methods, Individual Differences, and Applications. Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1996. 73-91

同被引文献64

引证文献8

二级引证文献41

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部