摘要
该研究引进ＰＯＭＳ，采用随机对照的方法将２８９名放化疗病人分成实验组和对照组，分别在治疗前中后测查三次，同时测查３８５名正常人，以验证其在中国大陆的适用情况。研究发现：ＰＯＭＳ各量表同质性信度高，三种方法检验的临床效度均较高，尤其是对心理干预的效果更敏感；但该问卷的区分效度不高，对正常人心境变化的敏感性不如对病人。由此得出，ＰＯＭＳ在中国大陆癌症病人中是可行的、可靠的、有效的和敏感的，可作为心理干预的一个敏感指标。
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the POMS used in China. 289 cancer patients in fourhospitals were randomly assigned to one of either experimental or control group, measured three times(pre-, on- and post-treatment), and one time for normal people. The major results were:there werehigher levels of homogeneity reliability and clinical validity tested by three ways, in all scales of POMS,especially sensitive to the effect of psychological intervention. But, the discriminant validity of POMSwas not strong, and the sensitivity to the changes of mood states was weaker in normal people than incancer patients. These results supported the POMS as a reliable, responsive, and valid measure of themood states, and a sensitive indicator to psychological intervention of cancer patients in China.
出处
《心理学报》
CSSCI
CSCD
北大核心
2000年第1期110-114,共5页
Acta Psychologica Sinica
基金
国家自然科学基金!39770265
