摘要
族谱大凡远溯名人为始祖或始迁祖又无确凿旁证支持的基本都属造伪,《白梅习氏族谱》中关于习凿齿的记载也属于此。吴直雄先生以《白梅习氏族谱》、子虚乌有的《大元大一统志》记载、1500年前袁州《郡志》所载习凿齿隐居江西的资料为依据,考证出习凿齿晚年隐居新余白梅,这一结论是错误的。吴直雄先生将《汉晋春秋》和《襄阳耆旧记》的完成时间、地点、内容及习凿齿的生卒年等全部弄错了。
Pedigree of a clan without surporting evidences, in which a famous person was regarded as the first ancestor, is generally fake. Therefor the records on Xi Zuochi in The Pedigree of Xi Family in Baimei are unrea- sonable. Based on The Pedigree of Xi Family in Baimei, unreal Da Yuan Dayitong Zhi, Jun Zhi by Yuan Zhou 1500 years ago, Wu Zhixiong holds that Xi Zuochi lived in seclusion in Baimei, Xinyu in the last days of his life. However this conclusion is wrong. Moreover, the time, the site and the content of Hai Jin Chunqiu and Xiangyang Qijiu Ji are wrong, including Xi Zuochi＇ s birth time and death time.
出处
《襄樊学院学报》
2011年第12期13-23,共11页
Journal of Xiangfan University
基金
全国高校古籍整理项目(0936)
