期刊文献+

英语学习者词汇复杂度的最新测量及验证 被引量:6

Validating a New Measure of EFL Learners’ Lexical Sophistication
下载PDF
导出
摘要 本研究介绍一种不受文本长度影响的英语学习者词汇复杂度测量方法——高级词汇多样性,论证该方法既测量学习者作文高级词型的使用量,又测量高级词型的使用频数。对模拟数据的描述性分析为高级词;12多样性的构念效度提供了有力的证据。方差分析表明,高级词汇多样性能够很好地区分不同英语水平组。高级词汇多样性与学习者英语作文质量、词汇多样性呈正相关,且在控制文本长度的条件下,和传统的高级词型与标记比率呈中高度正相关,说明高级词汇多样性有良好的共现效度。配对样本T检验发现,在短间隔的学习者两组作文中,高级词汇多样性测量具有稳定性。 This article introduces advanced lexical diversity (ALD), a measure of EFL learners' lexieal sophistication unaffeeted by text length, and attempts to demonstrate that ALD measures not only how many different advanced word types are used but also how they are repeated in a learner' s writing. The descriptive analyses of the simulation data provide strong evidence for the construct validity of ALD. An ANOVA reveals that ALD discriminates well among the leamers at different EFL learners' proficiency levels. ALD is positively correlated with EFL writing quality and lexical diversity, and a strongly positive correlation is found between ALD and the traditional advanced TTR when the EFL learners' text length is controlled. All these tests lend support to the eoneurrent validity of ALD. A paired-samples T-test shows that ALD is stable between EFL learners' two sets of essays written at a short interval.
作者 鲍贵
出处 《山东外语教学》 北大核心 2011年第6期44-52,共9页 Shandong Foreign Language Teaching
基金 教育部人文社会科学研究基金项目(09YJAZH044) 江苏省社会科学基金项目(09YYB010) 江苏省高校哲学社会科学研究基金项目(09SJB740009) 江苏省高校“青蓝工程”(苏教师〔2010〕27号)
关键词 词汇复杂度 高级词汇多样性 参数D 效度 信度 lexieal sophistication advanced lexical diversity parameter D validity reliability
  • 相关文献

参考文献19

  • 1Amaud, P. J. L. The lexieal richness of L2 written production and the validity of voeabtdary tests[A]. In T. Cul- hane, C. Klein-Braley & D. K. Stevenson (eds.). Practice and Problems in Language Testbtg[C]. Colchester: University of Essex, 1984.14 - 28.
  • 2Daller, H., R. Van Hour & J. Treffers-Daller. Lexical richness in the spontaneous speech of bilinguals[J]. Ap- plied Linguistics, 2003,24(2) : 197 -222.
  • 3Duran, P., D. Malvem, B. Riehards & IN. Chipere. Developmental trends ia lexieal diversity[J]. Applied Lin- guistics, 2004,25 (2) : 220 - 242.
  • 4Hyltenstam, K. Lexieal characteristics of near-native second-language hcamers of Swedish[J]. Journal of Multilin-gual and Multicultural Development, 1988,9( 1 -2) :67- 84.
  • 5Jarvis, S. Short texts, best-fitting curves and new measures of lexical diversity[J]. Language Testing, 2002,19 (1) :57- 84.
  • 6Laufer, B. Beyond 2000: A measure of productive lexicon in a second language [ A ]. In L. Eubank, L. Selinker & M. S. Smith (eds.). The Current State of Interlanguage [ C ]. Amsterdam/Philadelphia : John Benjamins, 1995. 265 - 272.
  • 7Laufer, B. & P. Nation. Vocabulary size and use: Lexical richness in L2 written production[J]. Applied Linguis- tics, 1995,16(3) :307 - 322.
  • 8Laufer, B. The development of passive and active vocabulary in a second language: Same or different? [J]. Ap- plied Linguistics, 1998,19(2) :255 - 271.
  • 9Linnarud, M. On Lexis: The Swedish learner and the native speaker compared[A]. In K. Sajavaara (ed.). Cross Language Analysis and Second Language Acquisition [ C]. Jyvaskyla: University of Jyvaskyla Press, 1983. 249 - 261.
  • 10Malvern, D., B. Richards, N. Chipere & P. Duren. Lexical Diversity and Language Development : Quantifica- tion and Assessment [ M ]. New York : Palgrave Macmillan, 2004.

二级参考文献36

  • 1文秋芳.英语专业学生口语词汇变化的趋势与特点[J].外语教学与研究,2006,38(3):189-195. 被引量:116
  • 2文秋芳.英语专业学生口语词汇进步模式研究[J].外语电化教学,2006(4):3-8. 被引量:23
  • 3Beers, S. F. & W. E. Nagy. 2009. Syntactic complexity as a predictor of adolescent writing quality: Which measures? Which register? [J]. Read Writ 22: 185-200.
  • 4Baba, K. 2009. Aspects of lexical proficiency in writing summaries in a foreign language [J]. Journal of Second Language Writing 18,191-208.
  • 5Berman, R. A. & L. Verhoeven. 2002. Crosslinguistic perspectives on the development of text-production abilities: Speech and writing[J]. Written Language and Literacy 5, 1 : 1-43.
  • 6Chastain, K. 1990. Characteristics of graded and ungraded compositions [J]. The Modern Language Journal 74, 1: 10-14.
  • 7Crowhurst, M. 1983. Syntactic complexity and writing quality: A review [J!. Canadian Journal of Education 8, 1: 1-16.
  • 8Engber, C. A. 1995. The relationship of lexical proficiency to the quality of L2 compositions[J]. Journal of Second Language Writing 4: 139-155.
  • 9Foster, P., A. Tonkyn & G. Wigglesworth. 2000. Measuring spoken language: A unit for all reasons [J]. Applied Linguistics 21, 3: 354-375.
  • 10Foster, P. & P. Tavakoli. 2009. Native speakers and task performance: Comparing effects on complexity, fluency, and lexical diversity [J]. Language Learning 59, 4: 866-896.

同被引文献48

引证文献6

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部