期刊文献+

时间压力、知识异质性与审计团队判断绩效 被引量:4

Time Pressure,Knowledge Heterogeneity and Judgment Performance of Audit Team
下载PDF
导出
摘要 任务时间限制和团队知识异质性是审计团队作出专业判断的重要约束条件。解释时间压力下知识异质性对审计判断绩效的影响机制以及通过设计情景模拟实验对这一机制进行验证后发现,知识异质性和时间压力都能够显著影响审计判断绩效,时间压力与知识异质性对审计判断绩效存在交互效应,不同程度的时间压力能够改变知识异质性进而影响审计判断绩效的正负方向,而不同程度的知识异质性则能够显著影响时间压力进而影响审计判断绩效的强弱程度。 The time constraints of audit assignments and the knowledge heterogeneity of an audit team are the important constraints for an audit team to make a professional judgment. The mechanism of knowledge heterogeneity affecting audit judgment performance is explained in this article, and also verified by devising a situational simulation experiment. The results show that, knowledge het- erogeneity can obviously affect audit judgment performance, while time pressure can also obviously affect audit judgment performance. And effects of interaction between time pressure and knowledge heterogeneity which affect audit judgment performance exist, the influence direction of knowledge heterogeneity affecting audit judgment performance is adjusted by time pressure, the influence level of time pressure affecting audit judgment performance is adjusted by the extent of knowledge heterogeneity.
出处 《审计与经济研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2012年第1期24-29,共6页 Journal of Audit & Economics
基金 教育部人文社会科学规划基金项目(09YJA630128)
关键词 时间压力 知识异质性 审计判断绩效 审计团队 注册会计师审计 time pressure knowledge heterogeneity audit judgment performance audit team CPA audit
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

二级参考文献49

  • 1苗东升.论信息载体[J].重庆教育学院学报,2006,19(1):24-28. 被引量:11
  • 2张丽,辛自强.关系复杂性理论述评[J].心理与行为研究,2006,4(4):312-317. 被引量:4
  • 3福斯特,梅特卡夫.演化经济学前沿:竞争、自组织与创新政策[M].贾根良,译.北京:高等教育出版社,2005:12-14.
  • 4Mautz, Shaft. The philosophy of auditing [ M ]. American Accounting Association, 1961:42.
  • 5Sherer M, Kent D. Auditing and Accountability [ M ]. Pitman Books Limited, 1983 : 19 - 21.
  • 6林钟高.独立审计理论[M].上海:立信会计出版社,2002:239.
  • 7普利津高,斯唐热.从混沌到有序:人与自然的新对话[M].曾庆宏,沈小峰,译.上海:上海译文出版社,1987:40.
  • 8Weisberg R W, Alba J W. An examination of the alleged role of "fixation" in the solution of several "insight" problems [ J ]. Journal of Experimental psychology : General, 1981,110 (2) : 169 - 192.
  • 9Snyder G R. Order effects in belief updating: the belief - adjustment model [ J ]. Cognitive Psychology, 1984 ( 6 ) : 38 - 55.
  • 10Ashton A H,Ashton R H. Evidence-responsiveness in professional judgment: effects of positive versus negative evidence and presentation mode [ J ]. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 1990,46 (6) : 1 -19.

共引文献71

同被引文献37

二级引证文献25

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部