期刊文献+

基于法律环境和两权分离的利益侵占研究——来自中国民营上市公司的经验证据 被引量:11

Legal System Environment—Based and,the Separation of Ownership and Control Right and Benefit Embezzlement: Empirical Evidence from China Private Listed Companies
下载PDF
导出
摘要 利用2003—2007年我国民营上市公司的数据,计量分析控股股东对上市公司的利益侵占,实证检验控制权和所有权的分离、法律制度环境对公司利益侵占的影响。研究发现:公司所有权和控制权分离度越低,利益侵占水平就越低;上市公司所在地区的法律制度环境越好,利益侵占水平就越低;控制权与所有权的分离为控制股东侵占中小股东利益提供了动机和便利,使得这类公司存在更大的代理问题,而解决此问题的关键在于改善法律制度的环境和加强对投资者的法律保护。 By using the data from China private listed companies during the period form 2003 to2007, and taking the capital embezzlement of listed companies by the holding stockholders as a measurement of benefit embezzlement, we have done an empirical study to examine the effect imposed by the separation of control right and ownership and the influence of the legal system environment on the benefit embezzlement. It is found that the lower the separation level, the lower the embezzlement level; the better the legal system environment of the district of the company, lower the embezzlement level. The separation of control right and ownership provides motivation and convenience for controlling the benefit embezzlement of small and medium stockholders by the holding stockholders, as a result, there will be more problems of agency arising among such companies. Therefore, the key to settling the problem lies in improving the legal system environment and strengthening the legal protection of investors.
出处 《审计与经济研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2012年第1期90-98,共9页 Journal of Audit & Economics
关键词 所有权和控制权 股权结构 两权分离 代理问题 利益侵占 法律制度环境 ownership and control right equity structure separation of double rights agency problem benefit embezzlement legal system environment
  • 相关文献

参考文献23

  • 1贺勇,刘冬荣.终极产权、股权结构与财务履约差异——基于利益相关者的实证研究[J].审计与经济研究,2011,26(3):84-91. 被引量:3
  • 2Claessens S, Djankov S, Fan J P, et al. The separation of ownership and control in east asian corporations [ J ]. Journal of Financial Economics,2000,58 (3) : 81 - 112.
  • 3Lemmon M, Lins K. Ownership structure, corporate governance, and firm value: evidence from the east asian financial crisis [ J]. Journal of Finance,2003,58(4) :1445 - 1468.
  • 4Claessens S, Djankov S,Fan J P, et al. Disentangling the incentive and entrenchment effects of large shareholding [ J ]. Journal of Finance,2002,57(6) :2741 - 2771.
  • 5Bertrand M, Mehta P, Mullainathan S. Disentangling the incentive and entrenchment effects of large shareholding [J]. Journal of Finance ,2002,117 ( 1 ) :2741 - 2771.
  • 6Parta L, Silanes L D, Shleifer A, et al. Investor protection and corporation valuation [ J ]. Journal of Finance, 2002,57 (3) :1147 -1171.
  • 7Mitton T. A cross-finn analysis of the impact of corporate governance on the east asian financial crisis [J]. Journal of Financial Economics, 2002,64 (2) :215 - 241.
  • 8Porta L, Silanes L D, Shleifer A, et al. Corporate ownership around the world [J]. Journal of Finance, 1999,54(2):471 -517.
  • 9Grossman S, Hart O. One share-one vote and the market for corporate control[ J]. Journal of Financial Economics, 1988, 20( 1 ) : 175 - 202.
  • 10Dyck A, Zingales L. Private benefits of control: an international comparison [J]. Journal of Finance,21XI4,59(4) :537 -600.

二级参考文献150

共引文献174

引证文献11

二级引证文献132

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部