期刊文献+

政府治理网络群体性事件的话语误区与策略 被引量:2

Wise Govern Approach to the Government's Response to Network Mass Disturbances under the Perspective of Discourse Theory
下载PDF
导出
摘要 中国网络群体性事件频发对政府的公共事务管理能力提出了严峻的挑战。基于后现代公共行政话语理论,剖析了政府在处理网络群体性事件时"失语、禁语、后语和妄语"的话语误区,认为政府在处理网络群体性事件时需要做到"建、引、规、纳":搭建官民网络互动平台,疏通网络舆论场;善待意见领袖,善引网络舆论;完善网络立法,规范网络话语;广纳民意,建立多方参与的社会讨论决策模式。 The ever-occurring Network Mass Disturbances has put forward rigorous challenge to the public affair administration of the government. Drawing lessons from core ideology of post-modem public administration Discourse Theory, the thesis will thoroughly analyze the government's discourse defect concerning inappropriate, taboo, implicative and lying discourse in handling Network Mass Disturbances. Finally, the wise govern strategy of the government in handing Network Mass Disturbances under the perspective of Discourse Theory will be discussed focally, including onstructing, conducting, controlling and adopting. There are dredging dredging public voice so as to set up interactive platform of network between citizens and the govemment, preferentially approaching to opinion leader in order to lead the trend of network public opinion for the purpose of grasping initiative of network public opinion, perfecting network legislation to boost authenticity of network discourse and widely absorbing popular will for constructing broadly based model of social discussion strategy.
出处 《湖南师范大学社会科学学报》 CSSCI 北大核心 2012年第1期9-12,共4页 Journal of Social Science of Hunan Normal University
基金 湖南省社科基金项目"湖南省社会组织管理创新研究"(2010YBB342) 湖南省软科学研究计划项目"产学研结合推动长株潭‘两型社会’试验区低碳经济发展研究"(2010ZK3057)
关键词 话语理论 网络群体性事件 政府 话语误区 善治策略 Disscourse Theory Network Mass Disturbances government discourse defect wise govern strategy
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

  • 1[美]查尔斯·J·福克斯,休·T·米勒.后现代公共行政:话语指向(楚艳红,曹沁颖,吴巧林译)[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2002.
  • 2叶立.2009上半年中国民众网络生活的回顾与反思.东京文学,2009,:128-128.
  • 3复旦大学新闻学院新闻网.2011年4月25日[EB/OL].http://www.xwxy.fudan.edu.on/node2/fdxwxy/xyxw/userobjectlail01956.html.
  • 4陈家刚.协商民主引论[J].马克思主义与现实,2004,56(3):26-34. 被引量:338

二级参考文献33

  • 1Joaeph M. Bessette, "Deliberative Democracy : The Majority Principle in Republican Govemment", in How Demo-cralic Is the Constitution? eds. Robert A. Goldwin and William A. Schambra, Washington : American Enterprise Institute, 1980.P. 102 - 116.
  • 2Bernard Manin, On Legitimacy and Pditical Deliberation, Political Theory. 1987, 15:338 - 368; Joshua Cohen, Deliberation and Democrafic Legitimacy, Alan Hamllin and Philip Pettit eds. The Good Polity: Normative Analysis of the State. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1989.P17- 34.
  • 3Jon Elster Edited, Deliberative Democracy, Cambridge University Press, 1998. P.6.3.
  • 4Jon FAster Edited, Deliberative Democracy, Cambridge University Press, 1998. P.44.
  • 5Maeve Cooke, Five Arguments for Deliberative Democracy, Political Studies, 2000, Vol,48,P.947 - 969.
  • 6David Miller, Is Deliberative Democracy Unfair to Disadvantaged Groups? Democracy as Public Deliberation: New Perspectives, Edited by Maurizio Pasaerin D' entreves, Manchester University Press, 2002. P.201.
  • 7Carolyn Hendriks, The Ambiguous Role of Civil Society in Deliberative Democracy, Refereed Paper Presented to the Jubilee Conference of the Australasian Political Studies Association, Australian National University, Canberra, October 2002.
  • 8Christian Hunold,Corporalism, Pluralism and Democracy: Toward a Deliberative Theory of Bureaucratic Accountability. Governance: An International Journal of Policy and Administration, Vol. 14, No. 2, Blackwell Publishers, 2001.
  • 9Jorge M. Valadez, Deliberative Democracy, Political Legitimaey, and Self- Democracy in Multicultural Societies, USA Westview Press, 2001. P. 30.
  • 10Joshua Cohen, Deliberation and Democratic Legitimacy, Deliberative Democracy: Essays on Reason and Politics, Edited by James Bohman and William Rehg, The MIT press, 1997. P. 67.

共引文献337

同被引文献27

引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部