期刊文献+

长距离“自己”的语义-语用解释理论及其问题 被引量:15

The semantico-pragmatic analysis of long-distance reflexive ziji (自己) and its problems
原文传递
导出
摘要 汉语中的反身代词"自己"能够被长距离约束。长距离"自己"具有主语指向性、涉己解及阻断效应这一系列特性。研究者从句法及语义—语用的角度对长距离"自己"进行了探索,而本文着重关注后者。文章在分析了上述关于长距离"自己"的三个特性之后,介绍了目前三个重要的关于长距离"自己"的语义—语用解释理论——自我归属理论、话者指向性解释及转换索引词和话者指示词解释,并分析了其中存在的问题。文末指明了今后需要进一步研究的方向。 The Chinese reflexive ziji can be long-distance bound. Long-distance ziji is subject-orientated, of obligatory de se reading in intentional contexts and susceptible to blocking effects. Efforts have been made to account for long-distance ziji by both syntactic and semantico-pragmatic approaches. This paper focuses on the latter. The three properties found with long-distance ziji are examined, and three prevailing theories are critically reviewed: theory of self-ascription, logophoric interpretation in Sells’ sense, and long-distance ziji as a shifted indexical or a logophor.
机构地区 香港城市大学
出处 《当代语言学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2012年第1期37-48,110,共12页 Contemporary Linguistics
关键词 长距离“自己” 自我归属 话者指向性 转换索引词 涉己 涉实 long-distance ziji (自己), self-ascription, logophoricity, shifted indexical, de se, de re
  • 相关文献

参考文献25

  • 1Anand, P. 2006. De de se. Ph.D. diss., MIT, Cambridge, MA.
  • 2Anand, P. and A. Nevins. 2004. Shifty operators in changing contexts. Proceedings of the 14th Semantics and Linguistics Theory Conference (SALT 14). Pp. 20-37.
  • 3Bettistella, E. 1989. Chinese reflexivization. Linguistics 27,987- I012.
  • 4Chierchia, G. 1989. Anaphora and attitudes De Se. In R. Bartsch, J. van Benthem, and P. van E. Boas, eds. , Language in Context. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Foils. Pp. 1 -31.
  • 5Clements, G. 1975. The logophoric pronoun in Ewe: Its role in discourse. The Journal of West African Languages 2,141 -77.
  • 6Cole, P., G. Hermon, and L. Sung. 1990. Principles and parameters of Long distance reflexives. Linguistic Inquiry 21,1 - 22.
  • 7Cole, P. , G. Hermon, and C.-T. J. Huang(黄正德),eds.,2001. Long Distance Reflexives. New York: Academic Press.
  • 8Cole, P., G. Hermon, and J. Huang. 2005. Long distance anaphors: An Asian perspective. In M. Everaert and H. van Riemsdijk, eds. , The Blackwell Companion to Syntax. Vol. 3. Malden, MA: Blackwell. Pp. 21-84.
  • 9Hagege, C. 1974. Les pronoms logophoriques. Bulletin de la Soci-t- de Linguistique de Paris 69,287 - 310.
  • 10Huang,J.andL.Liu(刘辰生).2001.Logophoricity, attitudes, and ziji at the interface.In P. Cole, et al. , eds. Pp. 141 -95.

同被引文献236

引证文献15

二级引证文献16

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部