长距离“自己”的语义-语用解释理论及其问题被引量：15

The semantico-pragmatic analysis of long-distance reflexive ziji (自己) and its problems

导出

摘要汉语中的反身代词"自己"能够被长距离约束。长距离"自己"具有主语指向性、涉己解及阻断效应这一系列特性。研究者从句法及语义—语用的角度对长距离"自己"进行了探索,而本文着重关注后者。文章在分析了上述关于长距离"自己"的三个特性之后,介绍了目前三个重要的关于长距离"自己"的语义—语用解释理论——自我归属理论、话者指向性解释及转换索引词和话者指示词解释,并分析了其中存在的问题。文末指明了今后需要进一步研究的方向。 The Chinese reflexive ziji can be long-distance bound. Long-distance ziji is subject-orientated, of obligatory de se reading in intentional contexts and susceptible to blocking effects. Efforts have been made to account for long-distance ziji by both syntactic and semantico-pragmatic approaches. This paper focuses on the latter. The three properties found with long-distance ziji are examined, and three prevailing theories are critically reviewed: theory of self-ascription, logophoric interpretation in Sells’ sense, and long-distance ziji as a shifted indexical or a logophor.

作者王莹莹潘海华

机构地区香港城市大学

出处《当代语言学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2012年第1期37-48,110,共12页 Contemporary Linguistics

关键词长距离“自己” 自我归属话者指向性转换索引词涉己涉实 long-distance ziji (自己), self-ascription, logophoricity, shifted indexical, de se, de re

分类号 H136 [语言文字—汉语]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献25

1Anand, P. 2006. De de se. Ph.D. diss., MIT, Cambridge, MA.
2Anand, P. and A. Nevins. 2004. Shifty operators in changing contexts. Proceedings of the 14th Semantics and Linguistics Theory Conference (SALT 14). Pp. 20-37.
3Bettistella, E. 1989. Chinese reflexivization. Linguistics 27,987- I012.
4Chierchia, G. 1989. Anaphora and attitudes De Se. In R. Bartsch, J. van Benthem, and P. van E. Boas, eds. , Language in Context. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Foils. Pp. 1 -31.
5Clements, G. 1975. The logophoric pronoun in Ewe: Its role in discourse. The Journal of West African Languages 2,141 -77.
6Cole, P., G. Hermon, and L. Sung. 1990. Principles and parameters of Long distance reflexives. Linguistic Inquiry 21,1 - 22.
7Cole, P. , G. Hermon, and C.-T. J. Huang(黄正德),eds.,2001. Long Distance Reflexives. New York: Academic Press.
8Cole, P., G. Hermon, and J. Huang. 2005. Long distance anaphors: An Asian perspective. In M. Everaert and H. van Riemsdijk, eds. , The Blackwell Companion to Syntax. Vol. 3. Malden, MA: Blackwell. Pp. 21-84.
9Hagege, C. 1974. Les pronoms logophoriques. Bulletin de la Soci-t- de Linguistique de Paris 69,287 - 310.
10Huang,J.andL.Liu(刘辰生).2001.Logophoricity, attitudes, and ziji at the interface.In P. Cole, et al. , eds. Pp. 141 -95.