摘要
刘知幾在《史通.补注》中对裴松之的《三国志注》提出了激烈的批评,长期以来学界认为这是对裴注的否定。事实上刘知幾否定的只是裴注中的"补阙"部分,并不反对其中的"论辨"。而在论述史学价值、撰史准则和史书体例要求及比较研究上,刘知幾则对裴注多有借鉴,是阳毁其注而阴效其法。
It has long been regarded in the academic circles the evidence against Pei Songzhi's Annotations of the History of the Three Kingdoms that Liu Zhiji fiercely criticized Pei's views in his Shi Tong - Mending Notes. In fact, Liu Zhiji's just disagreed with the "supplementary" part instead of the" argument" one of Pei's annotation. To the contrary, Liu Zhiji often took Pei's annotations for reference as in discussing the historical value, guidelines of historical writing, style and layout requirements of historical books, and the comparative study of history; therefore, he was against Pei's annotation in public but followed Prig methods in secret.
出处
《成都大学学报(社会科学版)》
2012年第1期40-44,共5页
Journal of Chengdu University (Social Sciences)