期刊文献+

《三国志》裴注对刘知幾史学批评的影响

The Influence of Pei's Annotations of the History of the Three Kingdoms on Liu Zhiji's Historical Criticism
下载PDF
导出
摘要 刘知幾在《史通.补注》中对裴松之的《三国志注》提出了激烈的批评,长期以来学界认为这是对裴注的否定。事实上刘知幾否定的只是裴注中的"补阙"部分,并不反对其中的"论辨"。而在论述史学价值、撰史准则和史书体例要求及比较研究上,刘知幾则对裴注多有借鉴,是阳毁其注而阴效其法。 It has long been regarded in the academic circles the evidence against Pei Songzhi's Annotations of the History of the Three Kingdoms that Liu Zhiji fiercely criticized Pei's views in his Shi Tong - Mending Notes. In fact, Liu Zhiji's just disagreed with the "supplementary" part instead of the" argument" one of Pei's annotation. To the contrary, Liu Zhiji often took Pei's annotations for reference as in discussing the historical value, guidelines of historical writing, style and layout requirements of historical books, and the comparative study of history; therefore, he was against Pei's annotation in public but followed Prig methods in secret.
作者 刘治立
出处 《成都大学学报(社会科学版)》 2012年第1期40-44,共5页 Journal of Chengdu University (Social Sciences)
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

  • 1刘知畿.史通[M].长沙:岳麓书社,1993.
  • 2黎靖德.朱子语类[M].北京:中华书局,1986..
  • 3陈寿.三国志[M].北京:中华书局,1959..
  • 4赵翼.廿二史札记[M].北京:中华书局,1984..
  • 5柳诒徵.柳诒徵史学论文集[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,1991.
  • 6叶建华.从《三国志注》看裴松之的史学批评[J].晋阳学刊,1992(1):60-65. 被引量:4

共引文献1213

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部