期刊文献+

宋明武举比较研究 被引量:5

A Comparison of Martial Examination between Song and Ming Dynasties
下载PDF
导出
摘要 明代武举武学在借鉴唐宋(尤其是宋)制度的基础上,形成了自己的特色。宋明武举的异同,既是文武分途的趋势使然,又是我国"文治"社会进一步完善的表现,也是中央集权加强的必然。文章就宋明武举的应考资格、考试程序、考试内容与科目、录取名额、考务进行比较,指出其实效都未能实现其初衷,故遭到严厉的批判,然而在没有更好的制度出现时,这一制度却又持续到了清末。 On the basis of the martial arts and martial examination of Tang and Song Dynasties(especially Song Dynasty),the martial arts of Ming Dynasty formed its own characteristics.The differences and similarities of the martial arts between Song and Ming Dynasties were due both to the separation between civil and martial arts and the demonstration of the perfection of civil administration.This is also the inevitable result of the centrality of government's authority.This paper makes a comparison on examination qualification,examination procedure,examination content and subject,admission,examination administration between Song and Ming Dynasties.Although this system was severely criticized because the original intentions were not realized,it lasted to the end of Qing Dynasty because there was no better one to replace it.
作者 周兴涛 黄亮
出处 《西昌学院学报(社会科学版)》 2011年第4期76-80,共5页 Journal of Xichang University:Social Science Edition
基金 昆明学院院级课题"宋代武举武学研究"成果之一
关键词 武举 Song Dynasty Ming Dynasty Martial Examination
  • 相关文献

参考文献22

  • 1许有根.武举制度史略[M].苏州大学出版社,1997.
  • 2徐松辑.宋会要辑稿·选举[M].中华书局,1956.
  • 3《宋会要》.
  • 4清·张廷玉等朋史·选举志[M].中华书局,1979.
  • 5万历大明会典·兵部·武举[M].(台)国风出版社.1963.
  • 6王圻.续文献通考·选举考·武举[M].上海古籍出版社据明万历三十年松江府刻本影印,1997.
  • 7《民国开阳县志稿》第五章《教育·科贡》.
  • 8明·实录·崇祯长编[M].东京汲古书院,1989.
  • 9明·何孟春.余冬序录[A].杨学为.中国考试史文献集成·明代卷[C].高等教育出版社,2003.
  • 10清·龙文彬.明会要·选举一[M].中华书局,1956.

共引文献5

同被引文献258

引证文献5

二级引证文献9

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部