期刊文献+

论国际体育仲裁协议的自治性——特别述及国际体育仲裁院之规则与实践 被引量:1

Autonomy of International Sport Arbitration Agreement: Specially on the Rules and Practice of ICAS
下载PDF
导出
摘要 国际体育仲裁协议是体育仲裁机制的宪章,赋予其自治属性可据之免除司法机关的不当牵制而最大限度维护体育仲裁协议之有效性。根据国际体育仲裁规则与实践,国际体育仲裁协议的自治性表现为管辖权自治、法律适用自治和地位自治。国际体育仲裁院作为国际体育世界的"最高法庭",以其权威实践诠释了体育仲裁协议的自治特征,实现了行业自治与接近正义精神的两全。 International sports arbitration agreement is the charter of sports arbitration mechanism; autonomy can be taken as the justified reason to avoid the improper interruptions from judicial bodies, and so that the validity of arbitration agreement would be maintained at maximum. It includes autonomy of jurisdiction, autonomy of law application and autonomy of status according to international sports arbitration rules and practices. As the Supreme Court of international sports circles, International Court of Arbitration for Sports displays the autonomy character of international sports arbitration agreement through its classic cases, and the autonomy of sport circles and access to justice principle have been held completely.
作者 张春良
出处 《天津体育学院学报》 CAS CSSCI 北大核心 2011年第6期510-515,共6页 Journal of Tianjin University of Sport
基金 教育部人文社会科学研究基金项目(项目编号:11YJC820161)
关键词 国际 体育仲裁 仲裁协议 自治性 仲裁院 international sport arbitration arbitration agreement autonomy CAS
  • 相关文献

参考文献20

  • 1W Laurence Craig, William W Park, Jan Paulsson. International Chamber of Contmerce Arbitration [M]. New York: Ocean Pub, Inc. /Dobbs Ferry, 2000.
  • 2Gabrielle Kaufmann-Kohler. Arbitration at the Olympics : Issues of fasttrack dispute resolution and sports law [M]. New York: Kluwer Law International, 2001.
  • 3Matthieu Reeb. Digest of CAS Awards Ⅱ 1998-2000 [C]. Hague: Kluwer Law International, 2002: 808-813.
  • 4Richard McLaren. The CAS AD HOC Division at the Athens Olympic Games[J]. Marquette Sports Law Review, 2004( 15): 175.
  • 5潘喜梅.日本体育仲裁运作模式对我国体育仲裁机制建设的借鉴研究[J].西安体育学院学报,2011,28(4):423-427. 被引量:7
  • 6Ian S Blackshaw. Sport, Mediation and Arbitration [M]. Hague: T.M.C. Asser Press, 2009.
  • 7石现明.略论申请撤销国际体育仲裁院仲裁裁决的理由[J].天津体育学院学报,2011,26(3):237-241. 被引量:3
  • 8Mauro Rubino-Sammartano. International Arbitration Law and Practice [M]. Beijing: CITIC Publishing House, 2004.
  • 9黄晖.国际体育解纷机制的复级化及其正当性——基于CAS仲裁体制之研析[J].天津体育学院学报,2011,26(4):322-326. 被引量:2
  • 10Gerry Tucker, Antonio Rigozzi, Wang Wenying, et al. Sports Arbitration for the 2008 Beijing Olympic Games. lan S Blackshaw, Bobert C R C//Siekmann, Janwillem Sock (eds.). The Court of Arbitration for Sport ( 1984-2004 ). Hague : T.M.C. Asser Press, 2006.

二级参考文献47

  • 1赵秀文.论仲裁条款独立原则[J].法学研究,1997,19(4):66-76. 被引量:20
  • 2汪祖兴.效率本位与本位回归——论我国仲裁法的效率之维[J].中国法学,2005(4):113-122. 被引量:37
  • 3崔建远.合同法[M].北京:法律出版社,1998..
  • 4马丁·P·戈尔丁.法律哲学[M].北京:三联书店,1987,151.
  • 5沈四宝 薛源.《巴黎仲裁院与中国国际经济贸易仲裁委员会仲裁规则比较》[J].中国仲裁与司法,2004,.
  • 6Felix Dasser. International Arbitration and Setting Aside Proceedings in Switzerland: A Statistical Analysis[J]. ASA Bulletin, 2007( 1 ) : 466.
  • 7Antonio Rigozzi. Challenging awards of the Court of Arbitration for Sport[J]. Journal oflnternational Dispute Settlement, 2010( 1 ) : 218.
  • 8Swiss Federal Supreme Court. Swiss Int'l Arb L Report [R].Oxford: Oxford University Law Library,2008: 204.
  • 9Swiss Federal Supreme Court. Decision 4A_176/2008 [J].ASA Bulletin, 2009(2) : 133.
  • 10Swiss Federal Supreme Court. Swiss Int'l A rb L R eport[R ]. Oxford : Oxford University Law Library, 2009: 215.

共引文献121

同被引文献11

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部