期刊文献+

会话中人称指代引入的认知分析 被引量:1

Introducing a New Person Reference to Conversation:A Cognitive Analysis
下载PDF
导出
摘要 本文从人称指代的认知地位出发,通过分析指称使用者对不同认知地位的判断,进一步揭示了自然会话中人称指代引入过程中的指称使用、语篇特征以及策略选择规律。研究表明,人称指代引入前策略的使用对于指称的成功引入至关重要,而在引入过程中指称使用者对听话人认知地位的判断直接影响了人称指代语的使用形式及篇章策略的选择。 This paper,through analyzing differenct assessments of the cognitive status of person reference, attempts to reveal the referential forms,discourse features and strategies which are employed in introducing a new person reference in naturally-occuring conversation.The results show that preintroductory stategies are of crutial significance for sucessful introduction of new person reference to discourse and the assessment of the listener's cognitive status by the reference user may directly influence the proper choice of referential forms and assistant dicourse strategies.
作者 马文 纪云霞
出处 《外语研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2011年第6期17-23,112,共7页 Foreign Languages Research
基金 国家社会科学研究基金项目"基于自然会话语料库的汉英指称偏误及修正机制对比研究"(06BYY004)的阶段性成果
关键词 人称指代 认知语言学 会话分析 指称 篇章策略 person reference cognitive linguistics conversation analysis reference textual strategy
  • 相关文献

参考文献18

  • 1Allerton,A. J. 1996. Proper name and definite descriptions with the same reference~ A pragmatic choice for language users [J]. Journal of Pra~matics 65.. 621 - 633.
  • 2Ariel, M. 1990. Accessing Noun-phrase Antecedents[M]. London.. Roudedge.
  • 3Chafe,W. 1976. Givenness, contrastiveness, definiteness, subjects, topics and points of view [C].// C. Li. Subjects and Topics. NY.. Academic Press: 22 - 55.
  • 4Chafe, W. 1987. Cognitive constraints on information flow [C]//R. Tomlin. Coherence and Grounding in Discourse. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins: 21 - 25.
  • 5Enfield, N. J. & T. Stivers. 2007. Person Reference in Interaction : Linguistic', Cultural, and Social Perspectives [M]. Cambridge : CUP.
  • 6Fox, B. A. 1987. Discourse Structure and Anaphora : Written and Conversational English [M]. Cambridge: CUP.
  • 7Gundel,J. ,N. Hedberg &- R. Zacharski. 1993. Cognitive status and the form of referring expressions in discourse [J]. Language 69 .. 274 - 307.
  • 8Huang, Y. 2000. Discourse anaphora: Four theoretical models [J]. Journal of Pragmatics 32: 151 - 176.
  • 9Jefferson, G. 2004. Glossary of transcript symbols with an introduction [C] // G. Lerner. Conversation Analysis: Studies from the First Generation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins: 13 - 31.
  • 10Lambrecht, K. 1994. Information Struct:ure and Sentence Form: A Theory of Topic, Focus and the Mental Representations of Discourse Referents[M]. Cambridge: CUP.

二级参考文献19

  • 1马文.会话照应修正的认知可及性分析[J].解放军外国语学院学报,2002,25(6):5-8. 被引量:24
  • 2马文.会话语篇中指称阻碍的产生与修正[J].外语学刊,2006(1):50-58. 被引量:8
  • 3Allerton, A. J. 1996. Proper name and definite descriptions with the same reference: A pragmatics choice for language users[J]. Journal of Pragmatics 65: 621-33.
  • 4Ariel, M. 1990. Accessing Noun-phrase Antecedents IM]. London. Routledge,
  • 5Enfield, N. J. & T. Stivers (eds.). 2007. Person Reference in Interaction: Linguistic, Cultural, and Social Perspectives[C]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • 6Fox, B. A. 1987. Discourse Structure and Anaphora: Written and Conversational English [M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
  • 7Fox, B. A. & R. Jasperson. 1995. A syntactic exploration of repair in conversation[A]. In P. Davis (ed.). Descriptive and Theoretical Modes in the Alternative Linguistics [C]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 77- 134.
  • 8Geluykens, R. 1994. The Pragmatics of Discourse Anaphora in English. Evidence from Conversational Repair [M]. New York- Mouton de Gruyter.
  • 9Golato, 2004. A. Grammatical Structure and Sequential Organization : Grammatical Structure and Sequential Organization [M]. Amsterdam: John Benjiamins Publishing Company.
  • 10Huang, Y. 2000. Discourse anaphora : Four theoretical models [J ]. Journal of Pragmatics 32 : 151-76.

共引文献4

同被引文献19

  • 1陈新仁.论语用平衡[J].外语学刊,2004(6):42-47. 被引量:69
  • 2Antaki,C.&.S.Widdicombe.1998.Identities in Talk [C].London:Sage.
  • 3Brewer,M.B.W.Gardner.1996.Who is this "we"? Levels of collective identity and self representations [J],Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 71 (1):83-93.
  • 4Brown,G.& G.Yule.1983.Discourse Analysis [M].Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
  • 5Bucholtz,M.K.Hall.2005.Identity and interaction:A sociocultural linguistic approach [J].Discourse Studies 7(4-5):584 - 614.
  • 6Davies,B.&.R.Harre.1990.Positioning:The discursive production of selves [J],Journal for the Theory of SocialBehavior 20 (1):43 - 63.
  • 7De Fina,A.,D.Schiffrin & M.Bamberg.2006.Discourse and Identity [C].Cambridge:CPU.
  • 8Dol6n,R.J.Todoli.2008.Analyzing Identities in Discourse [C].Amsterdam:John Benjamins B.V.
  • 9Grice,H.P.1975.Logic and conversation [C] // P.Cole J.Morgan.Syntax and Semantics vol.3:Speech Acts.NewYork:Academic Press:41-58.
  • 10Hecht,M.L.,M.J.Collier & S.Ribeau.1993.African American Communication % Ethnic Identity and CulturalInterpretation [M].Newbury Park,CA:Sage.

引证文献1

二级引证文献337

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部