期刊文献+

多终点变量对药物疗效评价的影响 被引量:2

Effect of multiple endpoints on the efficacy assessment in clinical trials
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:探讨在新药临床试验中多终点变量对药物疗效评价的影响。方法:通过Monte Carlo模拟探索在不同疗效分布类型中多终点变量间的相关性及其对疗效客观评价的影响,并比较不同校正方法控制试验总的Ⅰ类错误的优劣。结果:在不同疗效分布类型中多终点变量间存在不同程度的相关性,在控制整个试验的alpha消耗中若考虑到多终点变量间相关性的存在,较之于一般的校正法能更好地控制试验总的Ⅰ类错误。结论:在新药临床试验中应严格控制主要指标个数,可根据疗效分布类型选择合适的评价指标,当存在多个主要指标时应考虑到指标间的相关性,并采用合适的校正方法控制试验的假阳性率。 Objective: To determine the effect of multiple endpoints on efficacy assessment in clinical trials.Methods: By Monte Carlo simulation,we studied the correlations of multiple endpoints in different efficacy distributions and corresponding effect on the efficacy assessment in clinical trials,and compared the performances of several adjusted methods on controlling the Family-Wise type I error rate(FWER).Results: Simulation results showed that different degrees of correlations existed between different multiple endpoints.Conclusion: The number of endpoints should be controlled strictly.Correlations between endpoints should be considered where multiple endpoints are needed.Properly adjusted method should be chosen according to the correlation degree.
出处 《中国新药杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2011年第24期2396-2399,2408,共5页 Chinese Journal of New Drugs
基金 国家自然科学基金(81072390)
关键词 临床试验 多终点 Ⅰ类错误 alpha消耗 MONTE CARLO模拟 clinical trial multiple endpoints type I error alpha spending Monte Carlo simulation
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1SCHULZ KF, GRIMES DA. Muhiplicity in randomised trials I: endpoints and treatments [ J ]. Lancet, 2005, 365 ( 9470 ) : 1591 - 1595.
  • 2化学药物和生物制品临床试验的生物统计学技术指导原则[S].2006.
  • 3International Conference on Harmonization (ICH) of Technical Requirements for Regulations of Pharmaceuticals for Human use. ICH tripartite guideline E-9 document, statistical principles for clinical trials[ S]. 1998.
  • 4MARKUS N. How to deal with multiple endpoints in clinical trials[J].Fundam Clin Pharmacol, 2006, 20(6) :515 -523.
  • 5LEON AC, HEO M. A comparison of multiplicity adjustment strategies for correlated binary endpoints [ J ]. J Biopharm Statis, 2005,15(5) : 839 -855.
  • 6国家食品药品监督管理局.药品注册管理办法[S].第二十六条.2005.
  • 7HOCHBERG Y. A sharper Bonferroni procedure for multiple tests of significance[ J]. Biometrika, 1988,75 (4) :800 - 802.
  • 8HOMMEL G. A stagewise rejective multiple test procedure based on a modified Bonferroni test[J]. Biometrika, 1988, 75 (2) :383 -386.
  • 9JAMES S. Approxinale multinormal probabilities applied to correlated multiple endpoints in clinical trials[ J]. Star Med, 1991, 10(7) :1123 - 1135.
  • 10于浩,丁红,赵杨,苏炳华,丁德云,陈峰.临床试验中多个终点变量同时评价的多元logistic模型[J].中国卫生统计,2007,24(3):251-254. 被引量:6

二级参考文献9

  • 1陈峰.医用多元统计分析方法[M].北京:中国统计出版社,2001.135,14-4.
  • 2McCullagh P,Nelder JA.Generalized Linear Models London.2ed:Chapman & Hall,1989.
  • 3Stata.User's guide.Stata Press.2005.
  • 4Goldstein H.Multilevel statisticalmodels (3rd edition).London:Arnold.2003.
  • 5Yang M,Rasbash J,Goldstein H,et al.MLwiN macros for advanced multilevel modelling,Multilevel Models Project.Institute of Education,University of London,1999.
  • 6Rasbash R,et al.A user's guide to MLwiN.Multilevel Models Project.Institute of Education.University of London,2002.
  • 7Goldstein H.Multilevel mixed linear model analysis using iterative generalized least squares.Biometrika,1986,73:43-56.
  • 8Goldstein H.restricted unbiased iterative generalized least squares estimation.Biometrika,1989,76:622-623.
  • 9Goldstein,H,Rasbash J.Improved approximations for multilevel models with binary responses.Journal of the Royal Statistical Society A,1996:159,505-13.

共引文献5

同被引文献24

  • 1刘凤斌,方积乾,王建华.中医药临床疗效评价的探讨[J].中药新药与临床药理,2004,15(4):290-292. 被引量:92
  • 2孙文荣,孔爱君,王江涛,周春艳,鞠衍松,方崇乾.早期应用他汀类药物对急性心肌梗死病人总胆固醇、高敏C反应蛋白及不良事件的影响[J].青岛大学医学院学报,2006,42(2):164-165. 被引量:2
  • 3万霞,刘建平,张宏伟,艾艳珂.临床干预研究中结局指标的选择方法[J].中西医结合学报,2007,5(1):11-14. 被引量:22
  • 4邹建刚,曹克将,李东野,夏勇,智宏,任立群,侍作胜,阮红云,祝宝华,高阳,顾宁,曹守沛.参松养心胶囊治疗室性早搏的多中心随机对照研究[J].疑难病杂志,2007,6(3):138-140. 被引量:74
  • 5Ferreira-Gonzdlez I, Permanyer-Miralda G, Busse JW, et al. Method- ologic discussions for using and interpreting composite endpoints are limited,but still identify major concerns. Journal of Clinical Epidemiol- ogy ,2007,60(7 ) :651-657.
  • 6Neaton JD, Gray G, Zuckerman BD, et al. Key issues in endpoint selec- tion for heart failure trials: composite endpoints. J Card Fail, 2005,11 (8) :567-575.
  • 7Ranch G, Kieser M. An expected power approach for the assessment of composite endpoints and their components. Computational Statistics andData Analysis ,2013,60 : 111-122.
  • 8Ranch G, Kieser M. Multiplicity adjustment for composite binary end- points. Methods Inf Med,2012,51 (4) :309 -317.
  • 9Chow SC, Liu JP. Design and analysis of clinical trials : concepts and methodologies. New York : Wiley-Interscience ,2003:339-340.
  • 10Svensson E. Construction of a single global scale for multi-item assess- ments of the same variable. StatMed,2001,20 ( 24 ) : 3831-3846.

引证文献2

二级引证文献13

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部