摘要
目的探讨物理治疗宫颈糜烂样改变对再分娩时宫颈裂伤的影响。方法对2007年5月-2011年5月期间,我院经物理治疗宫颈糜烂样改变足月阴道分娩56例与同期足月阴道分娩且无物理治疗史的158病例患者,进行对比研究。结果是否进行物理治疗发生宫颈裂伤治疗统计学比较差异无显著性(P<0.05)。结论物理治疗宫颈糜烂样改变的方法只要操作正确,值得在基层医疗机构临床推广使用。
Objective To investigate the physical treatment of cervical erosion is changed to effect delivery again of cervical laceration. Methods In our hospital during May 2007 - May 2011 Compared to the physical treatment of cervical erosion change term vaginal delivery in 56 cases and the same term vaginal delivery and no physical therapy 158 cases patients. Results Whether for physical therapy in treatment of cervical lacerations occurred statistically no significant differences ( P 〈 0.05 ). Conclusion The physical treatment of cervical erosion changed approach as long as the correct operation, worthy of clinical use in basic medical institutions.
出处
《生物医学工程学进展》
CAS
2011年第4期243-244,共2页
Progress in Biomedical Engineering
关键词
宫颈糜烂样改变
再分娩
宫颈裂伤
cervical erosion change , before delivery,laceration of cervix