摘要
目的探讨文拉法辛缓释剂治疗广泛性焦虑症的临床疗效和安全性。方法将136例广泛性焦虑症患者随机分为文拉法辛缓释剂组68例和阿普唑仑组68例。怡诺思组治疗剂量75~150m g/d,阿普唑仑组为1.2~3.6m g/d,观察时间均为6周。治疗前与治疗第2、4、6周末采用汉密尔顿焦虑量表、焦虑自评量表、副反应量表评定临床疗效和副反应。结果两组疗效相当,差异无显著性(P〉0.05);阿普唑仑组起效时间快于文拉法辛缓释剂组,但远期疗效差于文拉法辛缓释剂组;怡诺思组副反应明显少于阿普唑仑组(χ2=7.49,P〈0.01)。结论文拉法辛缓释剂治疗广泛性焦虑疗效肯定,安全性高,依从性好,值得临床推广应用。
Objective To explore the clinical efficacy and safety of Venlafaxine extended-release in generalized anxiety disorder. Methods A total of 136 patients with generalized anxiety disorder were randomly divided into Venlafaxine and Alpralid group (each n= 68). Dosage of the Venlafaxine extended-release was 75-150mg/d and the Alpralid 1.2-3.6mg/d for 6 weeks. Clinical efficacy and side effects were assessed using Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale(HAMA),the Self-rating Anxiety Scale(SAS) and the Treatment Emergent Symptom Scale(TESS) before treatment and at the ends of 2nd,4th and 6th week treatment. Results Efficacies of 2 groups were equivalent and difference wasn't significant (P〉0.05) Alpralid took effect faster than Venlafaxine extended-release,but its long term efficacy was poorer side effects of the Venlafaxine extended-release was significantly fewer than those of the Alpralid (x^2= 7.49,P〈0. 01 ). Concl usion Venlafaxine extended-release has better efficacy,higher safety and compliance in the treatment of generalized anxiety disorder.
出处
《中国健康心理学杂志》
2011年第12期1417-1418,共2页
China Journal of Health Psychology