摘要
目的:探讨吻合器痔上黏膜环切术(PPH)+血栓剥除术治疗环状嵌顿痔的临床疗效。方法:对109例环状嵌顿痔手术治疗的患者随机分为A组和B组,分别行PPH+血栓剥除术(A组)与分段外剥内扎术(B组),并对2组患者的手术时间、术后疼痛的VAS评分、术后并发症(肛缘水肿、肛门狭窄)、住院时间等方面进行比较分析。结果:手术后2组患者的症状均缓解,但在手术时间、术后疼痛的VAS评分、术后并发症(肛缘水肿、肛门狭窄)发生率及住院时间方面,PPH+血栓剥除术均明显优于分段外剥内扎术(P<0.01)。结论:吻合器痔上黏膜环切术(PPH)+血栓剥除术安全、疗效确切。
Objective: To investigate the curative effect of procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids(PPH) with embolectomy surgery for crico-incarcerated Hemorrhoids.Methods: 109 patients with cricoincarcerated hemorrhoids were divided into group A(n=62)and group B(n=47),group A were operated on with PPH+ embolectomy surgery and group B underwent the segmented external dissention.The operative time,the pain score of VAS,the postoperative complications(anus margin edema and anus narrow)and the hospital stay were compared and analyzed.Results: The symptoms were relieved in both groups,while the patients treated with PPH+ embolectomy surgery had advantages of shorter operative time,less postoperative pain,fewer complications(anus margin edema and anus narrow),and shorter hospital stay than those of the group with the segmented external dissention(P0.01).Conclusion: Procedure for Prolapse and hemorrhoids with embolectomy surgery is safe and has a good curative effect.
出处
《河南大学学报(医学版)》
CAS
2011年第4期272-274,共3页
Journal of Henan University:Medical Science
关键词
吻合器
痔上黏膜环切术
分段外剥内扎术
环状嵌顿痔
Anastomat
Procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids
Piercing stripping outside and pricking inside
Crico-incarcerated hemorrhoids