期刊文献+

反应停联合DICE方案治疗难治性复发型非霍奇金淋巴瘤疗效分析 被引量:2

Clinical study of DICE combined thalidomide in treatment of relapsed or refractory non-Hodgkin's lymphoma
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:观察反应停联合DICE方案治疗难治性复发型非霍奇金淋巴瘤(NHL)的临床疗效及不良反应。方法:将64例难治性/复发型NHL患者随机分为两组,对照组采用DICE方案治疗,治疗组采用反应停联合DICE方案治疗,以21d为1个周期,对完成4个周期以上者进行疗效评价随访1年和2年生存率。结果:治疗组32例中完全缓解(CR)l5例(46.88%),部分缓解(PR)8例(25.00%),总有效率71.88%;对照组32例中CR 8例(25.00%),PR 6例(18.75%),总有效率为46.88%,两组比较有显著性差异。治疗组1年生存率和2年生存率分别为81.25%(26/32)和56.25%(18/32),对照组1年生存率和2年生存率分别为75.0%(24/32)和40.62%(13/32),较之对照组,治疗组1年生存率有增加趋势,但统计学比较无差异,而2年生存率两组比较有统计学差异(P<0.05)。结论:反应停联合DICE方案治疗难治性复发型NHL疗效满意,不良反应可以耐受,值得进一步研究应用。 Objective:To evaluate the therapeutic effects and adverse reactions of combined thalidomide and DICE in the treatment of relapsed or refractory non-Hodgkin's lymphoma(NHL).Methods: All 64 patients with refractory and relapsed NHL patients were randomly divided into two groups based,the control group was treated with DICE,treatment group was treated with thalidomide combined DICE,21days as one circle.The eficacy was evaluated after 4 circles.Results: The complete response rate,partial response rate,and total response rate were significantly higher in thalidomide combined DICE group than in DICE group(46.88% vs 25.00%,25.00% vs 18.75%,and 71.88%vs 46.88%,respectively,P0.05);There was no difference in one year survival rate of two groups.But there was significant difference in two-year survival rate.Conclusion: Combined thalidomide with DICE has good therapeutic effect in advanced NHL,and its toxicity is well tolerated.Further clinical study on the application of thalidomide with DICE is needed.
出处 《现代肿瘤医学》 CAS 2012年第1期149-151,共3页 Journal of Modern Oncology
关键词 难治性复发型非霍奇金淋巴瘤 反应停 化学治疗 疗效 不良反应 relapsed or refractory non-Hodgkin's lymphoma thalidomide chemotherapy effect adverse reactions
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

  • 1薄兰君,梁爱斌,刘班,陈毓华,王菲,金雪萍.DICE方案治疗难治和复发性非霍奇金淋巴瘤的疗效分析[J].癌症,2006,25(12):1553-1556. 被引量:10
  • 2Zelenetz AD,Hamlin P,Kewalramani T,et al.Ifosfamide,carboplatin,etoposide(ICE) based second line chemotherapy for the management of relapsed and refractor 5,aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma[J].Ann Oncol,2003,14:5 - 10.
  • 3Mayer J,Vasova I,Koristek Z,et al.Ifosfamide and etoposide based chemotherapy as salve and mobilizing regimens for poor prognosis lymphoma[J].Eur J Haematol Suppl,2001,64:21-27.
  • 4孔雁,董倩,姜达.沙利度胺治疗实体瘤的研究新进展[J].现代肿瘤医学,2010,18(8):1665-1669. 被引量:8
  • 5Ladizinski B,Shannon EJ,Sanchez MR,et al.Thalidomide and analogues:potential for immunomodulation of inflammatory and neoplastic dermatologic disorders[J].J Drugs Dermatol,2010,9(7):814-826.
  • 6Dal Lago L,Richter MF,Cancela AI,et al.Phase II trial and pharma.cokinetic study of thalidomide in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer[J].Invest New Drugs,2003,21(3):359-366.
  • 7Udvardy M.Therapy of mantle cell lymphoma[J].Orv Hetil,2009 10(50):2253-2257.
  • 8Bruera E,Neumann CM,Pituskin E,et al.Thalidomide in patients with cachexia due to terminal cancer preliminary response[J].Ann Oncol,1999,l0:857-859.
  • 9Pro B,Younes A,Albitar M.Thalidomide for patients with recurrent lymphoma[J].Cancer,2004,100(6):1186-1189.
  • 10杨磊,宋诸臣,徐小红,魏金芝,谭清和,丛智荣,彭春雷.DICE方案治疗复发或难治中高度恶性非霍奇金淋巴瘤的疗效分析[J].中国肿瘤临床,2008,35(20):1154-1157. 被引量:2

二级参考文献91

共引文献88

同被引文献36

  • 1韩锐. 肿瘤化疗的临床药理学[M].见:张天泽,徐光炜主编.肿瘤学[A].天津:天津科学技术出版社,1996,661-711. 修回日期:1999-09-11
  • 2周际昌.实用肿瘤内科学[M].2版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2009,47-48.
  • 3Cheson BD,Horning SJ,Coiffer B,et al. Report of an in-ternational workshop to standardize response criteria for non-Hodgkin lymphoma[J]. J Clin Oneol, 1999, 17 (4) : 1244-1253.
  • 4Dancey J,Steward WP. The role of vindesine in oncology recommendations after 10 years, experience[J]. Antican- eer Drugs,1995,6(5) :625-636.
  • 5Fisher RI, Gaynor ER, Dahlberg S, at el. Comparison of a standard regimen ( CHOP ) with three i ntensive chemotherapy regimens for advanced non-Hodgkin's lymphoma[ J ]. N Engl J Med, 1993,328 (14) : 1002 - 1006.
  • 6Pfreundschuh M, Schubert J, Ziepert M, et al. Six versus eight cycles of bi-weekly CHOP-14 with or without rituximab in elderly patients with aggressive CD20 + B- cell lymphomas : a randomised controlled trial( RICOVER 60) [ J ]. Lancet Oncol, 2008,9 ( 2 ) : 105 - 111.
  • 7Delarue R, Tilly H, Mounier N, et al. Dose-dense rituximab-CHOP compared with standard rituximab-CHOP in elderly patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (the LNH03-6B study) : a randomised phase 3 trial[ J]. Lancet Oncol,2013,14(6) :525 -533.
  • 8Cunningham D, Smith P, Mouncey P, et al. R-CHOP14 versus R-CHOP21 : Result of a randomized phase 111 trial for the treatment of patients with newly diagnosed diffuse large B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma [ J ]. J Clin Oncol, 2011, 29(suppl) : Abstr 8000.
  • 9Moore S, Peggs K, Thomson K, et al. Autologous stem cell transplantation remains beneficial for patients relapsing after R-CHOP and who respond to salvage chemotherapy [ J]. Br J Haematol,2012,156( 1 ) :142 - 143.
  • 10Coiffier B. Rituximab in combination with CHOP improves survival in elderly patients with aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma [ J ]. Semin Oncol, 2002,29 ( 1 ) : 18 - 22.

引证文献2

二级引证文献8

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部