中国史学史研究视角的转换

乔治忠认为,中国史学史学科体系的建设具有不同的构成层次,界定其学术任务和研究内容,展现学科性质的板块式逻辑结构,明晰学术研究的切入点,是独立学科地位能够成立的基础;探研中国传统史学发展的主导线索,划分中国史学的发展阶段,是在深入研究条件下的整体性把握。罗炳良认为,中国史学史的学科体系渐臻成熟,中国史学史研究也应当拓宽学术领域,促进史学史的内涵和体系不断深入和完善;要实现这个目标,至关重要的是加强史学思潮和史学批评范畴两个领域的研究。钱茂伟认为,需要用新的视角来研究史学史,一是用史学范型观照传统史学的发展历程,二是用国家与社会关系视角观照史学的发展历程;特别要重视研究民间史学,注重小历史的书写研究。朱政惠认为,中国史学史研究要放到国际中国史学史、东西方史学研究和交流的大环境中考察,从历史的纵向考察和横向的比较中探寻中国史学史研究的新方向。

Qiao Zhizhong holds that there are different strata in constructing the system of the history of Chinese historiography. The probing of a mainline in the development of traditional Chinese historiography, and dividing the stages of development in Chinese historiography, make up an integrated hold under the condition of a further study. Luo Bingliang believes that a system of the science of the history of Chinese historiography is getting matured. In order to broaden its academic field and to improve its content and system, it is important to enhance the studies on both the trend and the critical category of historiography. Qian Maowei proposes that it is necessary to take new perspectives in studying the history of historiography by viewing the development of traditional historiography with both the paradigm and the relations between state and society. Special attention should be paid to unofficial and minor histories. Zhu Zhenghui thinks that a new direction of the studies on Chinese historiography could be found by putting it in a wider situation of international research and exchange of Chinese and East-West historiography.