期刊文献+

不同肠管吻合方式对吻合口愈合的影响 被引量:3

Comparison of single-layer anastomosis and double-layer anastomosis of small intestine in dogs
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的观察不同吻合方法对犬小肠手术后吻合口愈合的影响,探讨其有效性及安全性。方法成年犬12条,根据吻合部位不同随机分为A、B2组,A组距离屈式韧带100cm小肠采用双层吻合,距离屈式韧带200cm小肠采用单层吻合;B组反之。术中记录2种吻合方式的操作时间。术后7d再次手术,找到吻合口并评价吻合口周围粘连分级,测量吻合破裂压(ABP)、小肠浆肌层破裂压。结果单层吻合与双层吻合后局部粘连分级未见明显差异;单层吻合与双层吻合的ABP分别为(325.83±88.03)和(331.25±70.33)cmH2O(1emH2O=0.098kPa,P〉0.05);单层吻合与双层吻合的浆肌层破裂压分别为(185.42±40.87)和(182.08±20.72)emH,O(P〉0.05);单层吻合和双层吻合时问分别为(17.08±3.20)和(23.50土2.50)min(P〈0.01)。结论单层吻合法是一种安全、有效的小肠吻合方法。 Objective To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of single-layer anastomosis and double-layer anastomosis of small intestine. Methods Twelve dogs were divided into two groups : group A (single-layer anastomosis at small intestine 100 cm after Treitz ligament and double-layer anastomosis at small intestine 200 cm after Treitz ligament, n = 6) ; group B (double-layer anastomosis at small intestine 100 cm after Treitz ligament and single-layer anastomosis at small intestine 200 cm after Treitz ligament, n = 6). The time used for each anastomosis were recorded. The second operations were performed on post-operative day 7 on all the dogs to determine in situ anastomostic bursting pressures (ABP) and the pressures while the serosa layer was torn. Results No anastomosis leak was found in twenty-four stoma of the twelve dogs. There was no significant difference between the stoma created by single-layer anastomosis and double-layer anastomosis on intraperitoneal adhesions. The averaged ABP in the single-layer anastomosis group and the double-layer anastomosis group was (325.83±88.03 ) and (331.25±70. 33 ) cm H20 (1 cm H2O±0. 098 kPa, P 〉0. 05). The pressures while the serosa layer was torn in the two group was ( 185.42±40. 87) and ( 182.08±20. 72) cm H20 respectively (P 〉0.05). The time used for single-layer anastomosis and double-layer anastomosis was ( 17.08±3.20) and (23.50±2. 50) minutes respectively (P 〈 0. 01 ). Conclusion The single-layer anastomosis is an effective and safe method for the anasto-mosis of small intestine.
出处 《中华实验外科杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2012年第1期89-91,共3页 Chinese Journal of Experimental Surgery
关键词 小肠 吻合 吻合口漏 Small intestine Anastomosis Anastomosis leak Dogs
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献99

  • 1黄从云,彭淑牖.肠道吻合愈合研究进展[J].国外医学(外科学分册),2005,32(2):114-119. 被引量:17
  • 2李龙 张金哲 潘云港 等.单层缝合用于小儿胃肠吻合34例体会[J].中国实用外科杂志,1997,(8):468-468.
  • 3[1]Fielding LP,Stewart-Brown S,Blesovsky L,Kearney G.Anastomotic integrity after operations for large-bowel cancer:a multicentre study.Br Med J 1980; 281:411-414
  • 4[2]Thornton FJ,Barbul A.Healing in the gastrointestinal tract.Surg Clin North Am 1997,77:549-573
  • 5[3]Nursal TZ,Anarat R,Bircan S,Yildirim S,Tarim A,Haberal M.The effect of tissue adhesive,octyl-cyanoacrylate,on the healing of experimental high-risk and normal colonic anastomoses.Am J Surg 2004; 187:28-32
  • 6[4]Akgun A,Kuru S,Uraldi C,Tekin O,Karip B,Tug T,Ongoren AU.Early effects of fibrin sealant on colonic anastomosis in rats:an experimental and case-control study.Tech Colaproctol 2006; 10:208-214
  • 7[5]Golub R,Golub RW,Cantu R Jr,Stein ltD.A multivariate analysis of factors contributing to leakage of intestinal anastomoses.J Am Coll Surg 1997; 184:364-372
  • 8[6]Dimov V,Ivanovska N,Manolova N,Bankova V,Nikolov N,Popov S:Immunomodulatory action of propolis,influence on anti-infectious protection and macrophage function.Apidologie 1991; 22:55-162
  • 9[7]Kismet K,Kilicoglu B,Koru O,Tanyuksel M,Oruc MT,orkun K,Salih B,Akkus MA.Evaluation on scolicidal efficacy of propolis.Eur Surg Res 2006; 38:476-481
  • 10[8]Silici S,Kutluca S.Chemical composition and antibacterial activity of propolis collected by three different races of honeybees in the same region.J Ethnopharmacol 2005; 99:69-73

共引文献29

同被引文献10

引证文献3

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部