摘要
有关WTO"公共道德例外"条款下"域外管辖"问题的争议由来已久,并伴随着域外管辖措施在实践中的广泛应用而益发激烈。对此,DSB欠缺有效的回应,依据《维也纳条约法公约》规定的解释方法亦无法获知准确答案,文末依据国际法上对于四大管辖权原则的具体设置推知:对于侵犯基本人权等有违公共道德的行为,各国方可行使域外管辖权。
The disputes about the "extraterritoriality" in WTO "public morals exception" have existed for a long time, and become more intense with the extraterritorial measures widely application in practice. The DSB lacked effective response to it and there was also no accurate answer. And according to the interpretation, it means regulated in Vienna Convention in the Law of Treaties. It can be inferred from the principles of jurisdiction that countries can exercise jurisdiction on some basic human rights violations against public moral.
出处
《法学杂志》
CSSCI
北大核心
2012年第1期165-169,共5页
Law Science Magazine
基金
湖南省社科成果评审课题"传染病防控之国际法制缺陷与对策研究"(1011008A)
湖南省社科基金课题"全球卫生治理视域下传染病防控之国际法制研究"(11YBA206)的阶段性成果
关键词
公共道德例外
域外管辖
管辖原则
public moral extraterritoriality principles of jurisdiction