期刊文献+

中日超市通道费盈利模式发展差异研究 被引量:4

Study on the Differences between China and Japan in the Development of Slotting Allowance-Profit Mode of Supermarket
下载PDF
导出
摘要 超市通道费盈利模式虽然存在一定的合理性,但因其会破坏零供关系、影响供应商的发展、不利于超市培育自身的经营能力和影响消费者利益而存在很大的弊端。综合来看,由于法律监管、供应商规模、消费者习惯和消费观念、商业文化等因素的不同,超市通道费盈利模式在中日两国的发展中表现出了明显的差异,要重塑我国超市盈利模式,必须完善相关法律法规并加大惩罚力度、扩大供应商的营销渠道以降低供应商对超市的依赖程度,并促使超市将目光从关注短期利益转向构建新的可持续盈利模式上。 Though the slotting allowance-profit mode of supermarket has its rationality,it can also ruin the relation between suppliers and demanders,impose a negative effect on the development of suppliers and go against the improvement of supermarkets' capability for operation and the benefit of consumers.Generally speaking,because of the differences in law and supervision,the scale of suppliers,the habit and consumption idea of consumers,the development of this mode in Japan and in China are quite different.To rebuild the profit mode of China's supermarket,we should improve the related laws and regulations,strengthen punishment,encourage the suppliers to find more marketing channels to decrease the level of dependence on the supermarket,and encourage the supermarkets to pay more attention to new sustainable profit modes.
出处 《中国流通经济》 CSSCI 北大核心 2012年第1期75-80,共6页 China Business and Market
基金 中国农业大学研究生科研创新专项基金"北京超市供应商费用壁垒与利润优势研究"(项目编号:15059210)的支持
关键词 通道费盈利模式 商业环境 中日比较 slotting allowance-profit mode business environment comparison between China and Japan
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献20

共引文献81

同被引文献2750

引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部