期刊文献+

各类高校学生评价教师课堂教学的调查研究 被引量:9

An Investigation into Students' Evaluation of Classroom Instruction in Different Types of Universities
下载PDF
导出
摘要 通过对上海地区12所不同类型高校教师和学生的问卷调查得到了四个方面的信息:大多数师生对"生评教"活动的必要性、目的或标准有较好的了解或认识;评教以网络方式为主,纸质问卷为辅;大多数学生认为"生评教"不至于影响师生关系,他们以教师授课水平为依据评教,多数教师认为"生评教"结果较为客观;大多数师生认为"生评教"对改进教学工作具有积极作用,并且教师会依据评价结果自觉改进教学。针对不同类型高校"生评教"的现状,可以得出如下建议:在网络评教的基础上,应建立集中的评教机制,以提高评教结果的客观性和准确性;学校领导应更新观念,确立学生在"生评教"中的主人翁地位;在"生评教"中建立和谐的师生关系,增强"生评教"结果的客观性。 A questionnaire survey of the teachers and students from 12 universities of different types in Shanghai shows that ( 1 ) most teachers and students have a good understanding of the necessity, the purpose and the yardsticks of teaching evaluation; (2) the evaluation is mainly conducted on the net with pen-and-paper surveys as a supplementary instrument; (3) most students think their evaluation do not exert influence on their relationship with the evaluated teachers because their evaluation is based on the skills and quality of their teaching; (4) most teachers think students' evaluation is quite objective and constructive to the improvement of their instruction. In view of the actual situation of students' evaluation of teaching in universities of different types, this paper suggests that a net-based concentrated teaching evaluation mechanism and a harmonious teacher-student relationship should be established to improve objectivity of the evaluation, and that the school authorities should break away with the traditional ideas to help students establish the standing of master in the evaluation.
作者 吴钢 于光磊
出处 《高校教育管理》 CSSCI 2012年第1期80-85,90,共7页 Journal of Higher Education Management
关键词 学生评价教师 学生评价教学 不同类型高校 students' evaluation of teachers students' evaluation of teaching different types of universities
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献19

  • 1钟锦文,张晓盈.美国大学“生评教”的经验与启示[J].江苏高教,2007(3):78-80. 被引量:20
  • 2JOHN A CENTRA. Reflective Faculty Evaluation[M]. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers, 1993.58.
  • 3STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT ALBANY. Student Form of Teaching Evaluation[Z]. Albany, 1996.
  • 4马克思.资本论(1)[M].北京:人民出版社,2004:198.
  • 5何福田.大学生评价教师教学能否促进师生情感之沟通.(台湾)明日世界,1984,(116).
  • 6信息学院简报(2007年第4期)[EB/OL].http://www.sist.tsinghua.edu.cn/Article_show_Static.asp?ArticleID=1208.
  • 7关于下发2006-2007学年下学期学生评教结果的通知(武大教函[2007]060号)[EB/OL].http://202.114.74.132/News/html/2007-10/1515.htm.
  • 8天津理工大学教师课堂教学质量学生评教指标[EB/OL].http://202.113.66.66/xjjpk_2005/gchhx/gezhang/xshpjiao.htm.
  • 9学生评教[EB/OL].http://jpkc.jnu.edu.cn/2007/sfx/kyyd/ShowArticle.asp?ArticleID=224.
  • 102007新生学习导航[EB/OL].http://e.njnu.edu.cn/stu/index_pop0206.htm.

共引文献340

同被引文献94

引证文献9

二级引证文献17

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部