期刊文献+

高校科研团队核心能力构建研究——以团队心智模型为中介变量 被引量:3

A Study on the Core Competence Construction of the Research Team: the Mediating Effect of Team Mental Model
原文传递
导出
摘要 基于华南地区131个高校科研团队的调查数据,以团队心智模型为中介变量,探讨了团队过程对团队核心能力构建的影响机制。研究表明:团队过程对团队心智模型的一致性与准确性均有直接正向影响,并通过一致性与准确性对团队核心能力有间接正向影响;团队心智模型准确性对一致性有直接正向影响,并通过一致性对团队核心能力有间接正向影响;而团队过程与团队心智模型准确性对团队核心能力的直接影响效应均不显著。最后,结合理论与实践经验对实证结果进行分析,并指出管理启示与研究局限。 Based on the survey data of 131 research teams in the South China region, the research explores the impact of team process on the core competence construction with team mental model as a mediating variable. The results show that: team process has a direct positive impact on the similarity and accuracy of team mental model, and also has indirect positive effect on team core competence through them. The accuracy has a direct effect on the similarity, and also has a positive effect on team core competence through it. Neither team process nor accuracy has a direct effect on team core competence. Finally, the empirical results, the management implication and research limitation are discussed
出处 《科学学与科学技术管理》 CSSCI 北大核心 2012年第1期173-180,共8页 Science of Science and Management of S.& T.
基金 国家自然科学基金项目"以产业技术为导向的产学研联盟组织模式与治理机制研究"(70973038)
关键词 团队过程 核心能力 团队心智模型 一致性 准确性 team process core competencies team mental models similarity accuracy
  • 相关文献

参考文献23

二级参考文献92

  • 1毛亚庆,夏仕武.何谓大学核心竞争力[J].北京大学教育评论,2005,3(2):108-112. 被引量:55
  • 2Jackson, S E, May, K E, and Whitney, K. Understanding the dynamics of diversity in decision making teams[A], in R A Guzzo, E Salas, and Associates ( Eds. ). Team effectiveness and decision making in organizations[C]. San Francisco: J ossey-Bass, 1995 : 53-75.
  • 3Simons, T, Pelled, L H, and Smith, K A. Making use of difference: Diversity, debate, and decision comprehensiveness in top management teams[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 1999,42 (6) : 662-673.
  • 4Paulus, P B. Groups, teams and creativity: The creative potential of idea generating groups[J]. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 2000,49 (2) : 237-262.
  • 5West, M A, and Hirst, G. Cooperation and teamwork for innovation[A], in M A West, D Tjosvold, and K G Smith(Eds. ). International handbook of organizational teamwork and cooperative working[C]. Chichester..John Wiley,2003:297-319.
  • 6West, M A. Sparkling fountains or stagnant ponds : An integrative model of creativity and innovation implementation within groups[J]. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 2002,51 (3) : 355- 386.
  • 7Edmondson, A C. Learning from mistakes is easier said than done: Group and organizational influences on the detection and correction of human error[J]. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 1996,32 (1) : 5- 28.
  • 8lAmabile, T M. Motivating creativity in organizations:On doing what you love and loving what you do[J]. California Management Review,1997,40(1):39-58.
  • 9Amabile, T M, Conti, R, Coon, H, Lazenby, J, and Herron, M. Assessing the work environment for creativity[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 1996,39(5) : 1 154- 1 184.
  • 10de Dreu,C K W. When too little or too much hurts: Evidence for a curvilinear relationship between task conflict and innovation in teams[J]. Journal of Management, 2006,32 (1) : 83- 107.

共引文献114

同被引文献30

引证文献3

二级引证文献13

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部