期刊文献+

扩展边境效应模型的鲁棒性检验研究——基于中美港口航运贸易数据 被引量:1

Study on Robustness Checks of the Extended Border Effect Model for Shipping Trade
原文传递
导出
摘要 在边境效应引力模型理论和实证研究的基础上,构建考虑贸易方向、适用于港口进出口航运贸易的边境效应引力模型的扩展模型,基于2005~2009年中美港口数据采用六种方法对构建的扩展模型进行鲁棒性检验和非线性检验。结果发现:构建的扩展模型是一个较优的模型,进出口港口的经济总量、吞吐量和两个港口之间的经济距离是影响双边航运贸易量的关键因素;距离的计算方法会造成边境效应的高估或低估;国家的有形边境会造成无形的贸易障碍,并在进出口两个方向上对贸易的阻碍程度是不对称的,但都显著存在。 Based on the Gravity Model, a new extended border effect model is built to consider the direction of international trade for shipping industry. Robustness checks and non-linear checks are conducted by using China-US shipping trade data over the period of 2005-2009. The results indicate that the new extended border effect model considering the direction of international trade is well-established, and that the aggregate economic level, ports' handling capacity and the distance between the import port and the export port are of greater importance in deciding the final volume of bilateral shipping trade. It is also found that the border effects exist with significance and vary in two directions, and that the way of calculating the variable of distance can trigger great differences in border effects.
作者 朱海霞
出处 《国际经贸探索》 CSSCI 北大核心 2012年第1期43-51,64,共10页 International Economics and Trade Research
基金 教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目(09YJC790186) 上海海事大学基金项目(20090142)
关键词 边境效应 引力模型港口 航运贸易 贸易方向 border effect gravity model port shipping trade the direction of trade
  • 相关文献

参考文献23

  • 1国家信息中心.中国区域间投入产出表[M].北京:社会科学文献出版社,2005..
  • 2Anderson M.A., Smith L.S. 1999.Canadian Provinces in World Trade: Engagement and Detachment. Canadian Journal of Economics, 32(1).
  • 3Chen N. 2004.lntra-national versus International Trade in the European Union: Why do National Borders Matter'?. Journal of International Economics,63(1), 2004.
  • 4Coulombe S. Border Effects and North American Economic Integration: Where are we up to? University of Ottawa, Canada, 2003. Paper presented at the workshop, Social and Labour Market Aspects of North American Linkages, organized by Industry Canada and Human Resources Development Canada, November 20 - 22, 2002, rectified.
  • 5Daumal M., Zignago S. 2005.The Border Effects in Brazi. CEPⅡ 9.
  • 6Disdier A.C, Head K. 2008.The Puzzling Persistence of the Distance Effect on Bilateral Trade. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 90(1).
  • 7Evans C.L. 2003.The Economic Significance of National Border Effects. American Economic Review, 93(4).
  • 8Frankel J. A., Wei S-J.1993. A Pacific Economic Bloc: Is there such an Animal?. FRBSF Economic Letter, Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco. issue Nov 12-22.
  • 9Fukao K. 2004.Why has the Border Effect in the Japanese Market Declined?. The Role of Business Networks, in East Asia RIETI Discussion Paper Series 04-E-016.
  • 10Head K, Mayer T. 2000.Non-Europe-The Magnitude and Causes of Market Fragmentation in the EU. Weltwirt- Schaftliches Archive, 136(2).

共引文献34

同被引文献6

引证文献1

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部