摘要
目的:探讨不同营养方式对危重病患者NF-κB活性、IL-1和IL-8水平的影响,观察并发症并进行药物经济学分析。方法:80例危重病患者分为研究A组和B组。每组各40例。40名健康体检者为正常对照组。A组采用肠内营养+肠外营养联合营养方式。B组采用全肠外营养支持,两组患者经计算等热量等氮补充。营养支持前1d及营养支持后第10天,抽取外周静脉血,ELIAS法检测外周血单个核细胞NF-κB活性,血浆IL-1和IL-8的水平。观察两组并发症及死亡率,并进行药物经济学分析。结果:营养支持前A组和B组患者NF-κB活性、IL-1和IL-8水平明显高于正常组(P<0.05);营养支持前A组及B组患者NF-κB活性、IL-1和IL-8水平,无明显差异(P>0.05);营养支持后第10d,A组及B组患者的NF-κB活性、IL-1和IL-8水平明显下降,与营养支持前比较有明显差异(P<0.05);A组和B组比较,A组下降明显(P<0.05)。A组患者并发症发生率少于B组患者(P<0.05)。A组死亡率为30.0%,B组死亡率为32.5%,两者相比无明显差异(P>0.05)A组患者平均每天用于营养支持的费用明显少于B组患者(P<0.05)。结论:危重病患者通常存在炎症过度反应。肠内+肠外营养联合营养方式更能降低危重患者的炎症反应,并发症少,有较高的经济学效益。
Objective: To investigate the effects of different nutrition support style on activity of nuclear factor-κB,the levels of IL-1 and IL-8 in critically ill patients.At the same time,the complications were observed and drug economics benefits were analysed.Method: 80 critically ill patients were divided into the trial group(group A) and the control group(group B).Each group with 40 patients.40 health subjects with medical check-up were included in the normal group.Group A were treated with EN+PN.Group B were treated with standard TPN.Two groups were supplied with equal nitrogen and caloricity.The activity of NF-κB,the level of IL-1 and IL-8 were detected before and after treatment.The control and trial groups were followed up for 28 days,and the mortality and complications were observed.Drug economics benefits of two groups were analysed.Result: The activity of NF-κB,the levels of IL-1 and IL-8 in critically ill patients were significantly higher than those in normal group(P0.05).The activity of NF-κB,the level of IL-1 and IL-8 were not significant different between group A and group B before treatment(P0.05).The activity of NF-κB,the level of IL-1 and IL-8 in two groups after treatment were significantly lower than those before treatment(P0.05).The activity of NF-κB,the level of IL-1 and IL-8 in group A after treatment were lower than those in group B after treatment(P0.05).The rate of complication in group A was lower than group B(P0.05).The cost that was used for nutrition support average every day in group A was lover than group B(P0.05).The mortality in group A was 30.0%,and the mortality in group B was 32.5%.The difference was not obvious(P0.05).Conclusion: The critically ill patients have the characteristic of inflammatory reaction disorder.The EN+PN nutrition support can decrease the inflammatory mediators of critically ill patients,alleviate the inflammatory reaction.It also decrease the rate of complication and has high economic effect.
出处
《河北医学》
CAS
2012年第1期4-7,共4页
Hebei Medicine
关键词
肠内+肠外营养
全肠外营养
危重病
核因子-κB
药物经济学
Enteral+parenteral nutrition
Total parenteral nutrition
Critical illness
Nuclear factor-κB
Drug economics