期刊文献+

国际投资协定框架下的税收问题研究 被引量:3

A Study for Taxation Issues under the International Investment Agreements
原文传递
导出
摘要 作为典型的"国家管理权"行为,东道国的税收措施可享有主权豁免。在通常情况下,与税收有关的投资争议不具可仲裁性。然而,晚近的缔约和法律实践却表明,在国际投资领域,东道国税收主权的绝对豁免已被突破,私人可以依据国际投资协定的有关规定将东道国的税收措施诉至国际仲裁庭。为此,需要引入专门的"税收条款",将可仲裁的税收事项限定于一定范围之内,以平衡东道国与外国投资者之间的利益。此类条款的引入也符合中国身兼投资输入大国和投资输出大国的发展中国家的综合利益。 As a typical "police power" conduct, eignty immunity. Generally speaking, a taxation recent treaties and legal practices of international any taxation measure of host country may be covered by soverissue relative to investment claim is non-arbitrable. However, investment indicate that the jurisdiction of international investment tribunal is expanded, so that the absolute immunity of tax sovereignty of host state does not exist. There-fore, it is necessary to introduce a special taxation clause that limits the scope of arbitrational tax issue, in order to strike a balance between the interests of the host country and those of foreign investors. It is accord with the China' s comprehensive benefit that is a developing country wearing hats of capital importing and exporting country.
作者 李庆灵
机构地区 厦门大学法学院
出处 《税务与经济》 CSSCI 北大核心 2012年第1期100-106,共7页 Taxation and Economy
基金 教育部2010年度人文社会科学研究青年项目"涉及贿赂的跨国投资合同法律问题研究"(项目编号:10YJA820105) 2011年度国家社会科学基金青年项目"中国双边投资保护条约(BIT)的差别化缔约实践法律问题研究"(项目编号:11CFX079)的阶段性成果之一
关键词 国际投资协定 税收争议 可仲裁性 行政审查 税收条款 International Investment Agreement taxation dispute arbitrability administrative audit taxation clause
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献78

  • 1屈广清,周清华,吴莉婧.论仲裁制度中的第三人[J].中国海商法年刊,2000,12(1):226-235. 被引量:24
  • 2萧凯,罗骁.仲裁第三人的法理基础与规则制定[J].法学评论,2006,24(5):71-79. 被引量:50
  • 3韩德培.国际私法[M].武汉:武汉大学出版社,1989..
  • 4《经济合作与发展组织关于对所得和财产征税协定范本》第25条.
  • 5Hugh J. Auh. Improving the Resolution of International Tax Disputes[J]. Fla. Tax Rev,2005,137.
  • 6《联合国关于发达国家与发展中国家避免双重征税协定范本》.
  • 7J. Kalieki &. S. Medeiros, Fair, Equitable and Ambiguous: What Is Fair and Equitable Treatment in International Investment Law?, ICSID Review-Foreign Investment Law Journal, Vol. 22, 2007.
  • 8T. J. Westcott, Recent Practice on Fair and Equitabie Treatment, The Journal of World Investment & Trade, Vol. 8, 2007.
  • 9International Thunderbird Gaming Corporation v. United Mexican States, http://ita. law. uvic. ca/documents/ThunderbirdAward. pdf, 2009- 12- 24.
  • 10Azurix Corp. v. Argentine Republic, ICSID Case No. ARB/01/12.

共引文献57

同被引文献22

  • 1余劲松.外资的公平与公正待遇问题研究——由NAFTA的实践产生的几点思考[J].法商研究,2005,22(6):41-48. 被引量:39
  • 2Richard E. W. Tax and Currency Issues in International Arbitration[ EB/OL]. [ 2012 - 03 - 10 ]. http ://www. utcle, org/ eLibrary/preview, php? asset__file_id = 15725.
  • 3Walde, A. Kolo. Investor-State Disputes: The Interface between Treaty-based International Investment Protection and Fiscal Sovereignty[ J]. Intertax.2007.35 ;424 -448.
  • 4UNCTAD. Taxatlon[EB/OL]. http://www, unctad, org~/en/docs/iteiitl6_en, pdf. , Oct 22, 2010.
  • 5Luke E. P. Research Note: Emerging Bilateral Investment Treaty Arbitration and Sustainable Development [ EB/OL]. [ 2012 - 03 - 10 ]. http ://www. iisd. org/pdf/2003/tmde_ bits disputes, pdf.
  • 6IMF. 2008 IMF Government Finance Statistics Yearbook [ EB/OL]. [ 2012 - 03 - 10 ]. http ://www. imf. org/extemal/ pubs/ft/gfs/yearbook/2008/gfsy08, pdf.
  • 7See Surya P. Subedi, International Investment Law, Reconciling Policy and Principle, Hart Publishing, Z008,pp. 34-37.
  • 8蔡从燕.《国际投资条约实践中的税收措施问题》,载黄进主编.《武大国际法评论》第13卷,武汉大学出版社2010年版,第116页,第118页,第125页.
  • 9See T. Walde and A. Kolo, Investor--State Disputes. The Interface between Treaty--based International Investment Protection and Fiscal Sovereignty, lntertax, 2007(35).
  • 10See UNCTAD, Taxation, UNCTAD Series on Issues in International Investment Agreements, UNCTAD/ITE/IIT/16, 2000, p. 36.

二级引证文献8

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部